jdbc - java.sql.Timestamp way of storing NanoSeconds

Question

java.sql.Timestamp constructor go like this:

public Timestamp(long time) {
    super((time/1000)*1000);
    nanos = (int)((time%1000) * 1000000);
    if (nanos < 0) {
        nanos = 1000000000 + nanos;     
        super.setTime(((time/1000)-1)*1000);
    }
}

It basically accepts time in millisecond and then extracts the last 3 digits and makes it nanos. So for a millisecond value of 1304135631 421, I'm getting Timestamp.getnanos() as 421000000. This is plain calculation (adding 6 zeroes at the end)... does not seems to be optimum.

A better way could have been Timestamp constructor that accepts time in nanoseconds and then calculates the nanosecond value out of that.

If you run the below program, you'll see the difference between actual nanoseconds and the one returned by Timestamp way of calculating nanosecods.

long a = System.currentTimeMillis();
    for(;;){
        long b = System.currentTimeMillis();
        Timestamp tm = new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());
        System.out.println(tm.getTime());
        System.out.println(tm.getNanos());
        System.out.println("This is actual nanos" + System.nanoTime()%1000000000);
        System.out.println("--------------------------");
        if(b-a >= 1)
            break;
    }

So all the discussion about Timestamp that says it stores time up to nanoseconds , does not seems to be so correct.. Isn't?

Answer 1

The time in millis does not represent the time in nanos. More precise it simply can't be. You're supposed to use Timestamp#setNanos() to set the real nanos.

long timeInMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
long timeInNanos = System.nanoTime();

Timestamp timestamp = new Timestamp(timeInMillis);
timestamp.setNanos((int) (timeInNanos % 1000000000));

// ...