Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
507 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

oracle11g - Why oracle IN clause has limit of 1000 only for static data?

Oracle IN clause has limit of 1000 for static data,but it accepts unlimited data from sub queries. why?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

It's a restriction on any expression list:

A comma-delimited list of expressions can contain no more than 1000 expressions.

Why 1000? Presumably the implementation needs some kind of limit, and that probably seemed like more than enough. There may well be, or certainly may have been when that limit was set decades ago, a performance reason for the limit as well, particularly as the IN is converted to multiple OR statements by the optimiser in this case (which you can see if you look at the execution plan).

I'd struggle to come up with a reasonable scenario that needed to get anywhere near that, with fixed values that couldn't be derived from other data anyway as a subquery.

I suspect it's somewhat related to the logical database limits which say you can't have more than 1000 columns in a table, for instance; since an expression list is used in an insert statement to list both the columns and the values being inserted, the expression list has to be able to match that, but maybe has no reason to exceed it.

Speculation of course... without seeing the internals of the software you're unlikely to get a definitive answer.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

56.8k users

...