I am trying to understand the way move constructors and assignment ops work in C++11 but I'm having problems with delegating to parent classes.
The code:
class T0
{
public:
T0() { puts("ctor 0"); }
~T0() { puts("dtor 0"); }
T0(T0 const&) { puts("copy 0"); }
T0(T0&&) { puts("move 0"); }
T0& operator=(T0 const&) { puts("assign 0"); return *this; }
T0& operator=(T0&&) { puts("move assign 0"); return *this; }
};
class T : public T0
{
public:
T(): T0() { puts("ctor"); }
~T() { puts("dtor"); }
T(T const& o): T0(o) { puts("copy"); }
T(T&& o): T0(o) { puts("move"); }
T& operator=(T const& o) { puts("assign"); return static_cast<T&>(T0::operator=(o)); }
T& operator=(T&& o) { puts("move assign"); return static_cast<T&>(T0::operator=(o)); }
};
int main()
{
T t = std::move(T());
return 0;
}
However, when I compile and run under VS2012, the output indicates that the lvalue versions of the T0 members are called:
ctor 0
ctor
copy 0 <--
move <--
dtor
dtor 0
dtor
dtor 0
A similar situation (with a slightly different test case) happens with move assignments -- the move assignment operator of T calls the "normal" assignment operator of T0.
What am I doing wrong?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…