Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
518 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - emplace_back not working with std::vector<std::map<int, int>>

I am trying to do emplace_back into a std::vector<std::map<int, int>>, but could not find the right syntax to do it.

#include<map>
#include<vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<std::map<int, int>> v;
    std::map<int,int> a {{1,2}};

    v.push_back({{1,2}});

    v.emplace_back({1,2});    // error
    v.emplace_back({{1,2}});  // error
    v.emplace_back(({1,2}));  // error
}

push_back works here, but not emplace_back. How can I get emplace_back working?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

emplace_back does forward all arguments to a matching constructor of the member type. Now, std::map has a initializer-list constructor, but it expects a list of std::pair<const Key, Value>, i.e. std::pair<const int, int>. push_back is not a template, so it just expects one type and thus performs the conversion in place. That is, no type-deduction occurs here.

You would need to explicitly state that you want to have a std::pair; the following should work:

#include<map>
#include<vector>

int main()
{
    std::vector<std::map<int, int>> v;

    v.emplace_back(std::initializer_list<std::pair<const int, int>>{
            {1,2},{3,4},{5,6}});

    return 0;
}

For the same reason, this does not compile:

    v.emplace_back({std::pair<const int,int>(1,2),
                    std::pair<const int,int>(3,4)});

This is because, though a brace-enclosed list may yield an initializer-list, it doesn't have to. It can also be a constructor call or something like that. So, writing

auto l = {std::pair<const int,int>(1,2),
          std::pair<const int,int>(3,4)};

yields an initializer list for l, but the expression itself might be used in another way:

std::pair<std::pair<const int, int>, std::pair<const int, int>> p =
          {std::pair<const int,int>(1,2),
          std::pair<const int,int>(3,4)}

This whole stuff gets a bit messy.

Basically, if you have an brace-enclosed-list, it may yield an initializer list or call a matching constructor. There are cases where the compiler is not able to determine which types are needed; emplace_back is one of them (because of forwarding). In other cases it does work, because all types are defined in the expression. E.g.:

#include <vector>
#include <utility>

int main() 
{
    std::vector<std::pair<const int, int>> v = 
         {{1,2},{3,4},{5,6}};
    return 0;
}

Now the reason it doesn't work is that no type can be deduced. I.e. emplace_back tries to deduce the name of the input types, but this is not possible, since a brace-enclosed-list has several types it can describe. Hence there is not a matching function call.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...