Looks like the follow-up problem isn't [just?] due to JSLint being in beta. It's because Crockford no longer allows for
statements by default. Looks like I'm going to need to set aside a weekend to read the new instructions and source. Strange things are afoot at the Circle K, man.
The most important new feature of ES6 is proper tail calls. This has
no new syntax, so JSLint doesn't see it. But it makes recursion much more
attractive, which makes loops, particularly for loops, much less
attractive.
Then this in the /*jslint */
directive section's main table:
Description: Tolerate for
statement
Option: for
Meaning: true
if the for
statement should be allowed.
There's a little more explanation below the table:
JSLint does not recommend use of the for
statement. Use array methods
like forEach
instead. The for
option will suppress some warnings. The
forms of for
that JSLint accepts are restricted, excluding the new ES6 forms.
So to make this lint in the new JSLint, you need at least this code (with the for
directive set):
/*jslint white:true, for:true */
/*global scope, title */
function test()
{
"use strict";
var i;
for (i=0; i < scope.formData.tabs.length; i = i + 1) {
scope.formData.tabs[i].show = false; // hide all the other tabs
if (scope.formData.tabs[i].title === title) {
scope.formData.tabs[i].show = true; // show the new tab
}
}
}
Note that I did still have to move i
's initialization, so you might still have an issue worth reporting. I'll also admit I'm with Stephen at the question you link; I'm not sure why i+= 1
is better. But now it looks like a hard requirement. No plusplus
option.
Notice also that if the code isn't wrapped in a function (I wrapped in test
, above), you'll get Unexpected 'for' at top level.
, which is a new error.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…