Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
336 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

greasemonkey - @require-ing jQuery overwrites the page's $ variable

I'm @require-ing jQuery for my Greasemonkey script with this line in my script file:

// @require https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js

and it works quite well; I can use $('#id') to access the DOM.

However, the $ variable of the 'real' page is modified (where $ is jQuery 1.2.xx): I get an error that $.include is not defined.

I thought the sandbox model of Greasemonkey would prevent that the variables of the target-page are overwritten?

How can I ensure that the inclusion of javascript libraries does not affect the 'real' website, but only my Greasemonkey script?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Greasemonkey 1.0, radically changed the way the sandbox works, busting thousands of scripts. See also, jQuery in Greasemonkey 1.0 conflicts with websites using jQuery.

This is a huge problem, and I hope you will join me in voicing your opinion/experiences on the principle bug report for this issue.

Meanwhile, restore the sandbox to your script, and resolve the $ conflict, by editing your Metadata Block to end with the following lines:

// @grant       GM_addStyle
// ==/UserScript==
/*- The @grant directive is needed to work around a major design change introduced in GM 1.0,
    It restores the sandbox.
*/


Specifying a @grant value (other than none) reactivates the sandbox.


You might also consider switching to Scriptish, which has offered superior features and performance in the past, and does not suffer from this new sandbox behavior.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

56.9k users

...