Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
150 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - SQLAlchemy + SQLite: For each row in Table B find all matching rows in TableA

I'm trying to do a LEFT OUTER JOIN but SQLAlchemy keeps inserting an extra table in my FROM statement, and I don't know how to work around that. I've been able to figure out how to do this in raw SQLite. My question is how to do this in SQLAlchemy.

The Setup

I have two tables: annotations:

   id  image_id              bbox
0   1         1  [13, 13, 28, 15]
1   2         2  [13, 13, 28, 15]
2   3         2  [18, 10, 25, 17]
3   4         4  [13, 10, 25, 17]

and images:

   id file_name
0   1  img1.jpg
1   2  img2.jpg
2   3  img3.jpg
3   4  img4.jpg
4   5  img5.jpg

I've created SQLAlchemy declarative schema:

from sqlalchemy.sql.schema import Column
from sqlalchemy.types import Float, Integer, String, JSON
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
import sqlalchemy

Base = declarative_base()

class Annotation(Base):
    __tablename__ = 'annotations'
    id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
    image_id = Column(Integer, doc='', index=True, unique=False)
    bbox = Column(JSON)

class Image(Base):
    __tablename__ = 'images'
    id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True, doc='unique internal id')
    file_name = Column(String(512), nullable=False, index=True, unique=True)

I know I could probably do some magic where I let Annotation know that it's annotations.image_id column will correspond to the the Image's images.id column. But I'm trying to keep it simple. Perhaps I need to do that to accomplish what I want.

So, I've created a session and setup appropriate variables:

def main():
    from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
    import ubelt as ub
    from sqlalchemy import create_engine

    engine = create_engine('sqlite:///:memory:')
    Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
    DBSession = sessionmaker(bind=engine)
    session = DBSession()

    session.add(Annotation(id=1, image_id=1, bbox=[13, 13, 28, 15]))
    session.add(Annotation(id=2, image_id=2, bbox=[13, 13, 28, 15]))
    session.add(Annotation(id=3, image_id=2, bbox=[18, 10, 25, 17]))
    session.add(Annotation(id=4, image_id=4, bbox=[13, 10, 25, 17]))

    session.add(Image(id=1, file_name='img1.jpg'))
    session.add(Image(id=2, file_name='img2.jpg'))
    session.add(Image(id=3, file_name='img3.jpg'))
    session.add(Image(id=4, file_name='img4.jpg'))
    session.add(Image(id=5, file_name='img5.jpg'))
    session.commit()

    import pandas as pd
    print(pd.read_sql_table('annotations', con=engine))
    print(pd.read_sql_table('images', con=engine))

    # Args:
    parent_keyattr = Image.id
    keyattr = Annotation.image_id
    valattr = Annotation.id

A Correct Solution With Raw SQL

Now, I can get exactly what I want with raw SQLite:

    ###
    # Raw SQLite: Does exactly what I want
    ###
    parent_table = parent_keyattr.class_.__tablename__
    table = keyattr.class_.__tablename__
    parent_keycol = parent_table + '.' + parent_keyattr.name
    keycol = table + '.' + keyattr.name
    valcol = table + '.' + valattr.name
    expr = (
        'SELECT {parent_keycol}, json_group_array({valcol}) '
        'FROM {parent_table} '
        'LEFT OUTER JOIN {table} ON {keycol} = {parent_keycol} '
        'GROUP BY {parent_keycol} ORDER BY {parent_keycol}').format(
            parent_table=parent_table,
            table=table,
            parent_keycol=parent_keycol,
            keycol=keycol,
            valcol=valcol,
        )
    print(expr)
    import json
    result = session.execute(expr)
    final = []
    for row in result.fetchall():
        key = row[0]
        group = json.loads(row[1])
        if group[0] is None:
            group = set()
        else:
            group = set(group)
        tup = (key, group)
        final.append(tup)

    print('final = {}'.format(ub.repr2(final, nl=1)))

This expands out to:

SELECT images.id, json_group_array(annotations.id)
FROM images
LEFT OUTER JOIN annotations
ON annotations.image_id = images.id
GROUP BY images.id ORDER BY images.id

and with some post-processing on row[1] returns:

final = [
    (1, {1}),
    (2, {2, 3}),
    (3, {}),
    (4, {4}),
    (5, {}),
]

The images 3 and 5 without annotations are correctly accounted for.


An Almost Correct Solution With SQLAlchemy

But I'm having a very hard time figuring out how to do the equivalent behavior with SQLAlchemy. I've tried several variation:

    # SQLite Alchemy

    ###
    # VERSION 1: Does not correctly return null for images without annotations
    ###

    parent_table = parent_keyattr.class_.__table__
    table = keyattr.class_.__table__

    grouped_vals = sqlalchemy.func.json_group_array(valattr, type_=JSON)
    query = (
        session.query(keyattr, grouped_vals)
        .outerjoin(parent_table, parent_keyattr == keyattr)
        .group_by(parent_keyattr)
        .order_by(parent_keyattr)
    )
    print(query.statement)

    final = []
    for row in query.all():
        key = row[0]
        group = row[1]
        if group[0] is None:
            group = set()
        else:
            group = set(group)
        tup = (key, group)
        final.append(tup)
    print('final = {}'.format(ub.repr2(final, nl=1)))

This expands to: SELECT annotations.image_id, json_group_array(annotations.id) AS json_group_array_1 FROM annotations LEFT OUTER JOIN images ON images.id = annotations.image_id GROUP BY images.id ORDER BY images.id

And returns:

final = [
    (1, {1}),
    (2, {2, 3}),
    (4, {4}),
]

which is missing the values for images 3 and 5. This is because I queried on keyattr (annotations.image_id) instead of parent_keyattr (images.id).


An Attempt To Fix The Issue

But if I try to use parent_keyattr I get an error when I try the outer join


    grouped_vals = sqlalchemy.func.json_group_array(valattr, type_=JSON)
    query = (
        session.query(parent_keyattr, grouped_vals)
        .outerjoin(parent_table, parent_keyattr == keyattr)
    )

InvalidRequestError: Can't determine which FROM clause to join from, 
there are multiple FROMS which can join to this entity. 
Please use the .select_from() method to establish an explicit left side, 
as well as providing an explcit ON clause if not present already to help
resolve the ambiguity.

Looking at:

print(session.query(parent_keyattr, grouped_vals))

this makes sense because I get:

SELECT images.id AS images_id, json_group_array(annotations.id) AS json_group_array_1 
FROM images, annotations

The issue is the both images and annotations are in the FROM statement.

I'm not sure if there is a way to force grouped_vals to think its FROM statement targets the annotations table. I've tried several variants but have had little luck sofar.


A Better But Not Perfect Fix

The best luck I've had was by wrapping grouped_vals in a str. Which does let me get exactly what I want, but I lose the nice type_=JSON that automatically took care of converting the result to json for me.

    grouped_vals = sqlalchemy.func.json_group_array(valattr, type_=JSON)
    query = (
        session.query(parent_keyattr, str(grouped_vals))
        .outerjoin(table, parent_keyattr == keyattr)
        .group_by(parent_keyattr)
        .order_by(parent_keyattr)
    )
    print(query.statement)

    final = []
    for row in query.all():
        key = row[0]
        group = json.loads(row[1])
        if group[0] is None:
            group = set()
        else:
            group = set(group)
        tup = (key, group)
        final.append(tup)
    print('final = {}'.format(ub.repr2(final, nl=1)))

I would like to know if there is a way to force grouped_vals to target the "images" table instead of "annotations", so I don't have to wrap it in a string, and I don't have to manually convert to JSON.

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66053491/sqlalchemy-sqlite-for-each-row-in-table-b-find-all-matching-rows-in-tablea

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)
Waitting for answers

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...