If I have a method that requires a parameter that,
- Has a
Count
property
- Has an integer indexer (get-only)
What should the type of this parameter be? I would choose IList<T>
before .NET 4.5 since there was no other indexable collection interface for this and arrays implement it, which is a big plus.
But .NET 4.5 introduces the new IReadOnlyList<T>
interface and I want my method to support that, too. How can I write this method to support both IList<T>
and IReadOnlyList<T>
without violating the basic principles like DRY?
Edit: Daniel's answer gave me some ideas:
public void Foo<T>(IList<T> list)
=> Foo(list, list.Count, (c, i) => c[i]);
public void Foo<T>(IReadOnlyList<T> list)
=> Foo(list, list.Count, (c, i) => c[i]);
private void Foo<TList, TItem>(
TList list, int count, Func<TList, int, TItem> indexer)
where TList : IEnumerable<TItem>
{
// Stuff
}
Edit 2: Or I could just accept an IReadOnlyList<T>
and provide a helper like this:
public static class CollectionEx
{
public static IReadOnlyList<T> AsReadOnly<T>(this IList<T> list)
{
if (list == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(list));
return list as IReadOnlyList<T> ?? new ReadOnlyWrapper<T>(list);
}
private sealed class ReadOnlyWrapper<T> : IReadOnlyList<T>
{
private readonly IList<T> _list;
public ReadOnlyWrapper(IList<T> list) => _list = list;
public int Count => _list.Count;
public T this[int index] => _list[index];
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() => _list.GetEnumerator();
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() => GetEnumerator();
}
}
Then I could call it like Foo(list.AsReadOnly())
Edit 3: Arrays implement both IList<T>
and IReadOnlyList<T>
, so does the List<T>
class. This makes it pretty rare to find a class that implements IList<T>
but not IReadOnlyList<T>
.
question from:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12838122/ilistt-and-ireadonlylistt 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…