Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
156 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - How to prevent inlined class template from being deleted by compiler

I have this class template defined in test.hpp:

#pragma once

extern void Foo();

template <typename F>
class MyClass {
public:
  void Compute() {
    Foo();
  }
};

And a function test() instantiate MyClass in test.cpp:

#include "test.hpp"

void test() {
  MyClass<int> a;
  a.Compute();
}

If compiled with clang++ test.cpp -S -emit-llvm, MyClass<int> and MyClass<int>::Compute() are kept in generated ll file.

  6 %class.MyClass = type { i8 }
  7 ; Function Attrs: noinline optnone ssp uwtable
  8 define void @_Z4testv() #0 {
  9   %1 = alloca %class.MyClass, align 1
 10   call void @_ZN7MyClassIiE7ComputeEv(%class.MyClass* %1)
 11   ret void
 12 }
 13 ; Function Attrs: noinline optnone ssp uwtable
 14 define linkonce_odr void @_ZN7MyClassIiE7ComputeEv(%class.MyClass* %0) #0 align 2 {
 15   %2 = alloca %class.MyClass*, align 8
 16   store %class.MyClass* %0, %class.MyClass** %2, align 8
 17   %3 = load %class.MyClass*, %class.MyClass** %2, align 8
 18   call void @_Z3Foov()
 19   ret void
 20 }

But for O2 compilation, MyClass<int>::Compute() is inlined and deleted, together with the MyClass<int> definition. For some reason, I want them kept in the generated file, like in O0. So my question is that is there a way to keep them not deleted? I'd expect a simple attribute on the class or the member function.

----Edit----

The reason I want to keep the class is because I need to register it into a framework. That framework will find its 'Compute' method and call it on demand. I thought it may fail the framework if the class definition is deleted. But in my real senario, 'MyClass' needs to be derived from a base class provided by the framework, and 'Compute' is a virtual function that 'MyClass' needs to override. On registering this class, I must provide a builder which returns a pointer of base class, pointing to 'MyClass' (like template <typename F> BaseClass *Builder() { return new MyClass<F>{}; }. And with all these present, the compiler won't delete 'MyClass'. When I was asking this question, I was trying to implement this derived class as a template class in a header file, and thought it might be a little bit different than a regular class implemented in cpp file that the framework usually expect. It turns out not that special. So I guess my question is not a good question. Thanks for all the comments and answers, still help me a lot, thanks.

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65860737/how-to-prevent-inlined-class-template-from-being-deleted-by-compiler

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

according to How to prevent gcc optimizing some statements in C?

for GCC You can use

#pragma GCC push_options
#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")

your code

#pragma GCC pop_options

or

 __attribute__((optimize("O0")))

for CLANG use:

[[clang::optnone]]

https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#id318


if your use this flags for generating ll file it will produce the correct code and you won't need to change the code:

-O2 -Xclang -disable-llvm-passes -S -emit-llvm

https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/oe31nv


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...