Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
317 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

pull - Does "git fetch --tags" include "git fetch"?

A nice and simple question - is the function of "git fetch" a strict sub-set of git fetch --tags?

I.e. if I run git fetch --tags, is there ever a reason to immediately run git fetch straight afterward?

What about git pull and git pull --tags? Same situation?

Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Note: starting with git 1.9/2.0 (Q1 2014), git fetch --tags fetches tags in addition to what are fetched by the same command line without the option.

To fetch only tags:

git fetch <remote> 'refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*'

In details:

See commit c5a84e9 by Michael Haggerty (mhagger):

Previously, fetch's "--tags" option was considered equivalent to specifying the refspec

refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*

on the command line; in particular, it caused the remote.<name>.refspec configuration to be ignored.

But it is not very useful to fetch tags without also fetching other references, whereas it is quite useful to be able to fetch tags in addition to other references.
So change the semantics of this option to do the latter.

If a user wants to fetch only tags, then it is still possible to specifying an explicit refspec:

git fetch <remote> 'refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*'

Please note that the documentation prior to 1.8.0.3 was ambiguous about this aspect of "fetch --tags" behavior.
Commit f0cb2f1 (2012-12-14) fetch --tags made the documentation match the old behavior.
This commit changes the documentation to match the new behavior (see Documentation/fetch-options.txt).

Request that all tags be fetched from the remote in addition to whatever else is being fetched.


Since Git 2.5 (Q2 2015) git pull --tags is more robust:

See commit 19d122b by Paul Tan (pyokagan), 13 May 2015.
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit cc77b99, 22 May 2015)

pull: remove --tags error in no merge candidates case

Since 441ed41 ("git pull --tags": error out with a better message., 2007-12-28, Git 1.5.4+), git pull --tags would print a different error message if git-fetch did not return any merge candidates:

It doesn't make sense to pull all tags; you probably meant:
      git fetch --tags

This is because at that time, git-fetch --tags would override any configured refspecs, and thus there would be no merge candidates. The error message was thus introduced to prevent confusion.

However, since c5a84e9 (fetch --tags: fetch tags in addition to other stuff, 2013-10-30, Git 1.9.0+), git fetch --tags would fetch tags in addition to any configured refspecs.
Hence, if any no merge candidates situation occurs, it is not because --tags was set. As such, this special error message is now irrelevant.

To prevent confusion, remove this error message.


With Git 2.11+ (Q4 2016) git fetch is quicker.

See commit 5827a03 (13 Oct 2016) by Jeff King (peff).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 9fcd144, 26 Oct 2016)

fetch: use "quick" has_sha1_file for tag following

When fetching from a remote that has many tags that are irrelevant to branches we are following, we used to waste way too many cycles when checking if the object pointed at by a tag (that we are not going to fetch!) exists in our repository too carefully.

This patch teaches fetch to use HAS_SHA1_QUICK to sacrifice accuracy for speed, in cases where we might be racy with a simultaneous repack.

Here are results from the included perf script, which sets up a situation similar to the one described above:

Test            HEAD^               HEAD
----------------------------------------------------------
5550.4: fetch   11.21(10.42+0.78)   0.08(0.04+0.02) -99.3%

That applies only for a situation where:

  1. You have a lot of packs on the client side to make reprepare_packed_git() expensive (the most expensive part is finding duplicates in an unsorted list, which is currently quadratic).
  2. You need a large number of tag refs on the server side that are candidates for auto-following (i.e., that the client doesn't have). Each one triggers a re-read of the pack directory.
  3. Under normal circumstances, the client would auto-follow those tags and after one large fetch, (2) would no longer be true.
    But if those tags point to history which is disconnected from what the client otherwise fetches, then it will never auto-follow, and those candidates will impact it on every fetch.

Git 2.21 (Feb. 2019) seems to have introduced a regression when the config remote.origin.fetch is not the default one ('+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*')

fatal: multiple updates for ref 'refs/tags/v1.0.0' not allowed

Git 2.24 (Q4 2019) adds another optimization.

See commit b7e2d8b (15 Sep 2019) by Masaya Suzuki (draftcode).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 1d8b0df, 07 Oct 2019)

fetch: use oidset to keep the want OIDs for faster lookup

During git fetch, the client checks if the advertised tags' OIDs are already in the fetch request's want OID set.
This check is done in a linear scan.
For a repository that has a lot of refs, repeating this scan takes 15+ minutes.

In order to speed this up, create a oid_set for other refs' OIDs.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...