Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
240 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - Why use as.factor() instead of just factor()

I recently saw Matt Dowle write some code with as.factor(), specifically

for (col in names_factors) set(dt, j=col, value=as.factor(dt[[col]]))

in a comment to this answer.

I used this snippet, but I needed to explicitly set the factor levels to make sure the levels appear in my desired order, so I had to change

as.factor(dt[[col]])

to

factor(dt[[col]], levels = my_levels)

This got me thinking: what (if any) is the benefit to using as.factor() versus just factor()?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

as.factor is a wrapper for factor, but it allows quick return if the input vector is already a factor:

function (x) 
{
    if (is.factor(x)) 
        x
    else if (!is.object(x) && is.integer(x)) {
        levels <- sort(unique.default(x))
        f <- match(x, levels)
        levels(f) <- as.character(levels)
        if (!is.null(nx <- names(x))) 
        names(f) <- nx
        class(f) <- "factor"
        f
    }
else factor(x)
}

Comment from Frank: it's not a mere wrapper, since this "quick return" will leave factor levels as they are while factor() will not:

f = factor("a", levels = c("a", "b"))
#[1] a
#Levels: a b

factor(f)
#[1] a
#Levels: a

as.factor(f)
#[1] a
#Levels: a b

Expanded answer two years later, including the following:

  • What does the manual say?
  • Performance: as.factor > factor when input is a factor
  • Performance: as.factor > factor when input is integer
  • Unused levels or NA levels
  • Caution when using R's group-by functions: watch for unused or NA levels

What does the manual say?

The documentation for ?factor mentions the following:

‘factor(x, exclude = NULL)’ applied to a factor without ‘NA’s is a
 no-operation unless there are unused levels: in that case, a
 factor with the reduced level set is returned.

 ‘as.factor’ coerces its argument to a factor.  It is an
 abbreviated (sometimes faster) form of ‘factor’.

Performance: as.factor > factor when input is a factor

The word "no-operation" is a bit ambiguous. Don't take it as "doing nothing"; in fact, it means "doing a lot of things but essentially changing nothing". Here is an example:

set.seed(0)
## a randomized long factor with 1e+6 levels, each repeated 10 times
f <- sample(gl(1e+6, 10))

system.time(f1 <- factor(f))  ## default: exclude = NA
#   user  system elapsed 
#  7.640   0.216   7.887 

system.time(f2 <- factor(f, exclude = NULL))
#   user  system elapsed 
#  7.764   0.028   7.791 

system.time(f3 <- as.factor(f))
#   user  system elapsed 
#      0       0       0 

identical(f, f1)
#[1] TRUE

identical(f, f2)
#[1] TRUE

identical(f, f3)
#[1] TRUE

as.factor does give a quick return, but factor is not a real "no-op". Let's profile factor to see what it has done.

Rprof("factor.out")
f1 <- factor(f)
Rprof(NULL)
summaryRprof("factor.out")[c(1, 4)]
#$by.self
#                      self.time self.pct total.time total.pct
#"factor"                   4.70    58.90       7.98    100.00
#"unique.default"           1.30    16.29       4.42     55.39
#"as.character"             1.18    14.79       1.84     23.06
#"as.character.factor"      0.66     8.27       0.66      8.27
#"order"                    0.08     1.00       0.08      1.00
#"unique"                   0.06     0.75       4.54     56.89
#
#$sampling.time
#[1] 7.98

It first sort the unique values of the input vector f, then converts f to a character vector, finally uses factor to coerces the character vector back to a factor. Here is the source code of factor for confirmation.

function (x = character(), levels, labels = levels, exclude = NA, 
    ordered = is.ordered(x), nmax = NA) 
{
    if (is.null(x)) 
        x <- character()
    nx <- names(x)
    if (missing(levels)) {
        y <- unique(x, nmax = nmax)
        ind <- sort.list(y)
        levels <- unique(as.character(y)[ind])
    }
    force(ordered)
    if (!is.character(x)) 
        x <- as.character(x)
    levels <- levels[is.na(match(levels, exclude))]
    f <- match(x, levels)
    if (!is.null(nx)) 
        names(f) <- nx
    nl <- length(labels)
    nL <- length(levels)
    if (!any(nl == c(1L, nL))) 
        stop(gettextf("invalid 'labels'; length %d should be 1 or %d", 
            nl, nL), domain = NA)
    levels(f) <- if (nl == nL) 
        as.character(labels)
    else paste0(labels, seq_along(levels))
    class(f) <- c(if (ordered) "ordered", "factor")
    f
}

So function factor is really designed to work with a character vector and it applies as.character to its input to ensure that. We can at least learn two performance-related issues from above:

  1. For a data frame DF, lapply(DF, as.factor) is much faster than lapply(DF, factor) for type conversion, if many columns are readily factors.
  2. That function factor is slow can explain why some important R functions are slow, say table: R: table function suprisingly slow

Performance: as.factor > factor when input is integer

A factor variable is the next of kin of an integer variable.

unclass(gl(2, 2, labels = letters[1:2]))
#[1] 1 1 2 2
#attr(,"levels")
#[1] "a" "b"

storage.mode(gl(2, 2, labels = letters[1:2]))
#[1] "integer"

This means that converting an integer to a factor is easier than converting a numeric / character to a factor. as.factor just takes care of this.

x <- sample.int(1e+6, 1e+7, TRUE)

system.time(as.factor(x))
#   user  system elapsed 
#  4.592   0.252   4.845 

system.time(factor(x))
#   user  system elapsed 
# 22.236   0.264  22.659 

Unused levels or NA levels

Now let's see a few examples on factor and as.factor's influence on factor levels (if the input is a factor already). Frank has given one with unused factor level, I will provide one with NA level.

f <- factor(c(1, NA), exclude = NULL)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1 <NA>

as.factor(f)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1 <NA>

factor(f, exclude = NULL)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1 <NA>

factor(f)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1

There is a (generic) function droplevels that can be used to drop unused levels of a factor. But NA levels can not be dropped by default.

## "factor" method of `droplevels`
droplevels.factor
#function (x, exclude = if (anyNA(levels(x))) NULL else NA, ...) 
#factor(x, exclude = exclude)

droplevels(f)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1 <NA>

droplevels(f, exclude = NA)
#[1] 1    <NA>
#Levels: 1

Caution when using R's group-by functions: watch for unused or NA levels

R functions doing group-by operations, like split, tapply expect us to provide factor variables as "by" variables. But often we just provide character or numeric variables. So internally, these functions need to convert them into factors and probably most of them would use as.factor in the first place (at least this is so for split.default and tapply). The table function looks like an exception and I spot factor instead of as.factor inside. There might be some special consideration which is unfortunately not obvious to me when I inspect its source code.

Since most group-by R functions use as.factor, if they are given a factor with unused or NA levels, such group will appear in the result.

x <- c(1, 2)
f <- factor(letters[1:2], levels = letters[1:3])

split(x, f)
#$a
#[1] 1
#
#$b
#[1] 2
#
#$c
#numeric(0)

tapply(x, f, FUN = mean)
# a  b  c 
# 1  2 NA 

Interestingly, although table does not rely on as.factor, it preserves those unused levels, too:

table(f)
#a b c 
#1 1 0 

Sometimes this kind of behavior can be undesired. A classic example is barplot(table(f)):

enter image description here

If this is really undesired, we need to manually remove unused or NA levels from our factor variable, using droplevels or factor.

Hint:

  1. split has an argument drop which defaults to FALSE hence as.factor is used; by drop = TRUE function factor is used instead.
  2. aggregate relies on split, so it also has a drop argument and it defaults to TRUE.
  3. tapply does not have drop although it also relies on split. In particular the documentation ?tapply says that as.factor is (always) used.

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...