The behavior of your code is unspecified as per the C++ Standard.
Explanation
The following (I removed std::endl
for simplicity)
std::cout << "Hello, world!" << print( std::cout );
is equivalent to this:
operator<<(operator<<(std::cout, "Hello, World!"), print(std::cout));
which is a function call, passing two arguments:
- First argument is :
operator<<(std::cout, "Hello, World!")
- Second argument is :
print(std::cout)
Now, the Standard doesn't specify the order in which arguments are evaluated. It is unspecified. But your compiler seems to evaluate the second argument first, that is why it prints "How are you?" first, evaluating the second argument to a value of type std::ostream&
which then gets passed to the call shown above (that value is the object std::cout
itself).
Why hexadecimal output?
You get hexadecimal output because the second argument evaluates to std::cout
, which is being printed as hexadecimal number, because std::cout
implicitly converts into pointer value of void*
type, which is why it is printed as hexadecimal number.
Try this:
void const *pointer = std::cout; //implicitly converts into pointer type!
std::cout << std::cout << std::endl;
std::cout << pointer << std::endl;
It will print the same value for both. For example, this example at ideone prints this:
0x804a044
0x804a044
Also note that I didn't use explicit cast; rather std::cout
is implicitly converted into pointer type.
Hope that helps.
What is the proper way to write a function that inserts data into an ostream
but that can also chain with operator<<
?
When it depends on what you mean by chaining? Obviously, the following wouldn't work (as explained above):
std::cout << X << print(std::cout) << Y << Z; //unspecified behaviour!
No matter how you write print()
.
However this is well-defined:
print(std::cout) << X << Y << Z; //well-defined behaviour!