My understanding about the Template argument deduction for class templates proposal was to homogenize the behaviour of template functions and template classes in deduction contexts. But I think that I have misunderstood something.
If we have this template object:
template <std::size_t S, typename T>
struct test
{
static constexpr auto size = S;
using type_t = T;
test(type_t (&input)[size]) : data(input) {}
type_t (&data)[size]{};
};
I tend to use a helper function as syntactic sugar for creating test
objects:
template <std::size_t S, typename T>
test<S, T> helper(T (&input)[S]) { return input; }
Which can be used as shown below:
int main()
{
int buffer[5];
auto a = helper<5, int>(buffer); // No deduction
auto b = helper<5>(buffer); // Type deduced
auto c = helper(buffer); // Type and size deduced
std::cout << a.size << b.size << c.size;
return 0;
}
The code above outputs 555
as expected. I've tried the same in Wandbox using the newer compiler setup1:
int main()
{
int buffer[5];
test<5, int> a(buffer); // No deduction: Ok.
test<5> b(buffer); // Type deduced: FAILS.
test c(buffer); // Type and size deduced: Ok.
std::cout << a.size << b.size << c.size;
return 0;
}
It looks like template argument deduction for class templates works only deducing all the parameters, I was expecting both behaviours (helper function and class template) to be the same, did I misunderstood something?
1The last compilers availables in Wandbox are gcc HEAD 7.0.1 201701 and clang HEAD 5.0.0 (trunk).
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…