Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
434 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - numpy: efficiently summing with index arrays

Suppose I have 2 matrices M and N (both have > 1 columns). I also have an index matrix I with 2 columns -- 1 for M and one for N. The indices for N are unique, but the indices for M may appear more than once. The operation I would like to perform is,

for i,j in w:
  M[i] += N[j]

Is there a more efficient way to do this other than a for loop?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

For completeness, in numpy >= 1.8 you can also use np.add's at method:

In [8]: m, n = np.random.rand(2, 10)

In [9]: m_idx, n_idx = np.random.randint(10, size=(2, 20))

In [10]: m0 = m.copy()

In [11]: np.add.at(m, m_idx, n[n_idx])

In [13]: m0 += np.bincount(m_idx, weights=n[n_idx], minlength=len(m))

In [14]: np.allclose(m, m0)
Out[14]: True

In [15]: %timeit np.add.at(m, m_idx, n[n_idx])
100000 loops, best of 3: 9.49 us per loop

In [16]: %timeit np.bincount(m_idx, weights=n[n_idx], minlength=len(m))
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.54 us per loop

Aside of the obvious performance disadvantage, it has a couple of advantages:

  1. np.bincount converts its weights to double precision floats, .at will operate with you array's native type. This makes it the simplest option for dealing e.g. with complex numbers.
  2. np.bincount only adds weights together, you have an at method for all ufuncs, so you can repeatedly multiply, or logical_and, or whatever you feel like.

But for your use case, np.bincount is probably the way to go.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...