c++ - What is the safe way to fill multidimensional array using std::fill?

Question

Here is what I am using:

class something
{
   char flags[26][80];
} a;

std::fill(&a.flags[0][0], &a.flags[0][0] + 26 * 80, 0);

(Update: I should have made it clear earlier that I am using this inside a class.)

Answer 1

The simple way to initialize to 0 the array is in the definition:

char flags[26][80] = {};

If you want to use std::fill, or you want to reset the array, I find this a little better:

char flags[26][80];
std::fill( &flags[0][0], &flags[0][0] + sizeof(flags) /* / sizeof(flags[0][0]) */, 0 );

The fill expressed in terms of the array size will allow you to change the dimensions and keep the fill untouched. The sizeof(flags[0][0]) is 1 in your case (sizeof(char)==1), but you might want to leave it there in case you want to change the type at any point.

In this particular case (array of flags --integral type) I could even consider using memset even if it is the least safe alternative (this will break if the array type is changed to a non-pod type):

memset( &flags[0][0], 0, sizeof(flags) );

Note that in all three cases, the array sizes are typed only once, and the compiler deduces the rest. That is a little safer as it leaves less room for programmer errors (change the size in one place, forget it in the others).

EDIT: You have updated the code, and as it is it won't compile as the array is private and you are trying to initialize it externally. Depending on whether your class is actually an aggregate (and want to keep it as such) or whether you want to add a constructor to the class you can use different approaches.

const std::size_t rows = 26;
const std::size_t cols = 80;
struct Aggregate {
   char array[rows][cols];
};
class Constructor {
public:
   Constructor() {
      std::fill( &array[0][0], &array[rows][0], 0 ); // [1]
      // memset( array, 0, sizeof(array) );
   }
private:
   char array[rows][cols];
};
int main() {
   Aggregate a = {};
   Constructor b;
}

Even if the array is meant to be public, using a constructor might be a better approach as it will guarantee that the array is properly initialized in all instances of the class, while the external initialization depends on user code not forgetting to set the initial values.

[1] As @Oli Charlesworth mentioned in a comment, using constants is a different solution to the problem of having to state (and keep in synch) the sizes in more than one place. I have used that approach here with a yet different combination: a pointer to the first byte outside of the bidimensional array can be obtained by requesting the address of the first column one row beyond the bidimensional array. I have used this approach just to show that it can be done, but it is not any better than others like &array[0][0]+(rows*cols)