Intrigued by this question about infinite loops in perl: while (1) Vs. for (;;) Is there a speed difference?, I decided to run a similar comparison in python. I expected that the compiler would generate the same byte code for while(True): pass
and while(1): pass
, but this is actually not the case in python2.7.
The following script:
import dis
def while_one():
while 1:
pass
def while_true():
while True:
pass
print("while 1")
print("----------------------------")
dis.dis(while_one)
print("while True")
print("----------------------------")
dis.dis(while_true)
produces the following results:
while 1
----------------------------
4 0 SETUP_LOOP 3 (to 6)
5 >> 3 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3
>> 6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 RETURN_VALUE
while True
----------------------------
8 0 SETUP_LOOP 12 (to 15)
>> 3 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (True)
6 JUMP_IF_FALSE 4 (to 13)
9 POP_TOP
9 10 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3
>> 13 POP_TOP
14 POP_BLOCK
>> 15 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
18 RETURN_VALUE
Using while True
is noticeably more complicated. Why is this?
In other contexts, python acts as though True
equals 1:
>>> True == 1
True
>>> True + True
2
Why does while
distinguish the two?
I noticed that python3 does evaluate the statements using identical operations:
while 1
----------------------------
4 0 SETUP_LOOP 3 (to 6)
5 >> 3 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3
>> 6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 RETURN_VALUE
while True
----------------------------
8 0 SETUP_LOOP 3 (to 6)
9 >> 3 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3
>> 6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
9 RETURN_VALUE
Is there a change in python3 to the way booleans are evaluated?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…