The fat arrow binds at 3 occasions
- when declaring a method
- when declaring a function within a method
- when declaring a function in global context
1. When declaring a method
When the Coffeescript compiler encouters the following syntactical pattern
within a class declaration
class A
somemethod: (paramlist) =>
This will yield the following code within the constructor of class A
this.somemethod = __bind(this.somemethod, this);
That is the definition for that instance is overwriting the initial assignment
with a bound version of the function
2. When declaring a function within a method
When you define a function with a fat arrow within a method the Coffeescript compiler
automatically creates a closure and and shadows this of the outer method into the variable
_this. Any reference to @ within the inner function will use the variable _this
in the generated javascript code
somemethod: ->
=> @someCall()
And this is the corresponding Javascript
A.prototype.somemethod = function() {
//_this references this
var _this = this;
return function() {
//and _this is now used within the inner function
return _this.someCall();
};
};
A definition of a function without the fat arrow doesn't create that closure for you.
3. When declaring a function in global context
If you define a free floating function (meaning as a method in a class and not within another function/method) just like this
foo = => @bar
Then the corresponding Javascript will look like this
var foo,
_this = this;
foo = function() {
return _this.bar;
};
The interesting thing here again is that this is being assigned to _this which enables the definition of foo to close over _this.
The important part however is that this is always the global context of your execution environment. If you are in the browser it will be the window object. If you are running node.js it will be the module you are just running.
Warning: You shouldn't define any function accessing your global context anyway. This calls for trouble.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…