Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
905 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - ROC curve from training data in caret

Using the R package caret, how can I generate a ROC curve based on the cross-validation results of the train() function?

Say, I do the following:

data(Sonar)
ctrl <- trainControl(method="cv", 
  summaryFunction=twoClassSummary, 
  classProbs=T)
rfFit <- train(Class ~ ., data=Sonar, 
  method="rf", preProc=c("center", "scale"), 
  trControl=ctrl)

The training function goes over a range of mtry parameter and calculates the ROC AUC. I would like to see the associated ROC curve -- how do I do that?

Note: if the method used for sampling is LOOCV, then rfFit will contain a non-null data frame in the rfFit$pred slot, which seems to be exactly what I need. However, I need that for the "cv" method (k-fold validation) rather than LOO.

Also: no, roc function that used to be included in former versions of caret is not an answer -- this is a low level function, you can't use it if you don't have the prediction probabilities for each cross-validated sample.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

There is just the savePredictions = TRUE argument missing from ctrl (this also works for other resampling methods):

library(caret)
library(mlbench)
data(Sonar)
ctrl <- trainControl(method="cv", 
                     summaryFunction=twoClassSummary, 
                     classProbs=T,
                     savePredictions = T)
rfFit <- train(Class ~ ., data=Sonar, 
               method="rf", preProc=c("center", "scale"), 
               trControl=ctrl)
library(pROC)
# Select a parameter setting
selectedIndices <- rfFit$pred$mtry == 2
# Plot:
plot.roc(rfFit$pred$obs[selectedIndices],
         rfFit$pred$M[selectedIndices])

ROC

Maybe I am missing something, but a small concern is that train always estimates slightly different AUC values than plot.roc and pROC::auc (absolute difference < 0.005), although twoClassSummary uses pROC::auc to estimate the AUC. Edit: I assume this occurs because the ROC from train is the average of the AUC using the separate CV-Sets and here we are calculating the AUC over all resamples simultaneously to obtain the overall AUC.

Update Since this is getting a bit of attention, here's a solution using plotROC::geom_roc() for ggplot2:

library(ggplot2)
library(plotROC)
ggplot(rfFit$pred[selectedIndices, ], 
       aes(m = M, d = factor(obs, levels = c("R", "M")))) + 
    geom_roc(hjust = -0.4, vjust = 1.5) + coord_equal()

ggplot_roc


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...