Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
430 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

linux kernel - module_init() vs. core_initcall() vs. early_initcall()

In drivers I often see these three types of init functions being used.

module_init()
core_initcall()
early_initcall()
  1. Under what circumstances should I use them?
  2. Also, are there any other ways of init?
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

They determine the initialization order of built-in modules. Drivers will use device_initcall (or module_init; see below) most of the time. Early initialization (early_initcall) is normally used by architecture-specific code to initialize hardware subsystems (power management, DMAs, etc.) before any real driver gets initialized.

Technical stuff for understanding below

Look at init/main.c. After a few architecture-specific initialization done by code in arch/<arch>/boot and arch/<arch>/kernel, the portable start_kernel function will be called. Eventually, in the same file, do_basic_setup is called:

/*
 * Ok, the machine is now initialized. None of the devices
 * have been touched yet, but the CPU subsystem is up and
 * running, and memory and process management works.
 *
 * Now we can finally start doing some real work..
 */
static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
{
    cpuset_init_smp();
    usermodehelper_init();
    shmem_init();
    driver_init();
    init_irq_proc();
    do_ctors();
    usermodehelper_enable();
    do_initcalls();
}

which ends with a call to do_initcalls:

static initcall_t *initcall_levels[] __initdata = {
    __initcall0_start,
    __initcall1_start,
    __initcall2_start,
    __initcall3_start,
    __initcall4_start,
    __initcall5_start,
    __initcall6_start,
    __initcall7_start,
    __initcall_end,
};

/* Keep these in sync with initcalls in include/linux/init.h */
static char *initcall_level_names[] __initdata = {
    "early",
    "core",
    "postcore",
    "arch",
    "subsys",
    "fs",
    "device",
    "late",
};

static void __init do_initcall_level(int level)
{
    extern const struct kernel_param __start___param[], __stop___param[];
    initcall_t *fn;

    strcpy(static_command_line, saved_command_line);
    parse_args(initcall_level_names[level],
           static_command_line, __start___param,
           __stop___param - __start___param,
           level, level,
           &repair_env_string);

    for (fn = initcall_levels[level]; fn < initcall_levels[level+1]; fn++)
        do_one_initcall(*fn);
}

static void __init do_initcalls(void)
{
    int level;

    for (level = 0; level < ARRAY_SIZE(initcall_levels) - 1; level++)
        do_initcall_level(level);
}

You can see the names above with their associated index: early is 0, core is 1, etc. Each of those __initcall*_start entries point to an array of function pointers which get called one after the other. Those function pointers are the actual modules and built-in initialization functions, the ones you specify with module_init, early_initcall, etc.

What determines which function pointer gets into which __initcall*_start array? The linker does this, using hints from the module_init and *_initcall macros. Those macros, for built-in modules, assign the function pointers to a specific ELF section.

Example with module_init

Considering a built-in module (configured with y in .config), module_init simply expands like this (include/linux/init.h):

#define module_init(x)  __initcall(x);

and then we follow this:

#define __initcall(fn) device_initcall(fn)
#define device_initcall(fn)             __define_initcall(fn, 6)

So, now, module_init(my_func) means __define_initcall(my_func, 6). This is _define_initcall:

#define __define_initcall(fn, id) 
    static initcall_t __initcall_##fn##id __used 
    __attribute__((__section__(".initcall" #id ".init"))) = fn

which means, so far, we have:

static initcall_t __initcall_my_func6 __used
__attribute__((__section__(".initcall6.init"))) = my_func;

Wow, lots of GCC stuff, but it only means that a new symbol is created, __initcall_my_func6, that's put in the ELF section named .initcall6.init, and as you can see, points to the specified function (my_func). Adding all the functions to this section eventually creates the complete array of function pointers, all stored within the .initcall6.init ELF section.

Initialization example

Look again at this chunk:

for (fn = initcall_levels[level]; fn < initcall_levels[level+1]; fn++)
    do_one_initcall(*fn);

Let's take level 6, which represents all the built-in modules initialized with module_init. It starts from __initcall6_start, its value being the address of the first function pointer registered within the .initcall6.init section, and ends at __initcall7_start (excluded), incrementing each time with the size of *fn (which is an initcall_t, which is a void*, which is 32-bit or 64-bit depending on the architecture).

do_one_initcall will simply call the function pointed to by the current entry.

Within a specific initialization section, what determines why an initialization function is called before another is simply the order of the files within the Makefiles since the linker will concatenate the __initcall_* symbols one after the other in their respective ELF init. sections.

This fact is actually used in the kernel, e.g. with device drivers (drivers/Makefile):

# GPIO must come after pinctrl as gpios may need to mux pins etc
obj-y                           += pinctrl/
obj-y                           += gpio/

tl;dr: the Linux kernel initialization mechanism is really beautiful, albeit highlight GCC-dependent.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...