c++ - Which greedy initializer-list examples are lurking in the Standard Library?

Question

Since C++11, the Standard Library containers and std::string have constructors taking an initializer-list. This constructor takes precedence over other constructors (even, as pointed out by @JohannesSchaub-litb in the comments, even ignoring other "best match" criteria). This leads to a few well-known pitfalls when converting all parenthesized () forms of constructors to their braced versions {}

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <vector>
#include <string>

void print(std::vector<int> const& v)
{
    std::copy(begin(v), end(v), std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout, ","));
    std::cout << "
";
}

void print(std::string const& s)
{
    std::cout << s << "
";
}

int main()
{
    // well-known 
    print(std::vector<int>{ 11, 22 });  // 11, 22, not 11 copies of 22
    print(std::vector<int>{ 11 });      // 11,     not 11 copies of 0

    // more surprising
    print(std::string{ 65, 'C' });      // AC,     not 65 copies of 'C'
}

I couldn't find the third example on this site, and the thing came up in the Lounge<C++> chat (in discussion with @rightfold, @Abyx and @JerryCoffin), The somewhat surprising thing is that converting the std::string constructor taking a count and a character to use {} instead of (), changes its meaning from n copies of the character to the n-th character (typically from the ASCII table) followed by the other character.

This is not caught by the usual brace prohibition on narrowing conversions, because 65 is a constant expression that can be represented as a char and will retain its original value when converted back to int (§8.5.4/7, bullet 4) (thanks to @JerryCoffin).

Question: are there more examples lurking in the Standard Library where converting a () style constructor to {} style, is greedily matched by an initializer-list constructor?

Answer 1

I assume, with your examples for std::vector<int> and std::string you meant to also cover the other containers, e.g., std::list<int>, std::deque<int>, etc. which have the same problem, obviously, as std::vector<int>. Likewise, the int isn't the only type as it also applies to char, short, long and their unsigned version (possibly a few other integral types, too).

I think there is also std::valarray<T> but I'm not sure if T is allowed to be integral type. Actually, I think these have different semantics:

std::valarray<double>(0.0, 3);
std::valarray<double>{0.0, 3};

There are a few other standard C++ class templates which take an std::initializer_list<T> as argument but I don't think any of these has an overloaded constructor which would be used when using parenthesis instead of braces.