That is ambiguous situation.
To disambiguate it, use explicit cast as:
typedef int (*funtype)(const std::string&);
std::function<int(const std::string&)> func=static_cast<funtype>(test);//cast!
Now the compiler would be able to disambiguate the situation, based on the type in the cast.
Or, you can do this:
typedef int (*funtype)(const std::string&);
funtype fun = test; //no cast required now!
std::function<int(const std::string&)> func = fun; //no cast!
So why std::function<int(const std::string&)>
does not work the way funtype fun = test
works above?
Well the answer is, because std::function
can be initialized with any object, as its constructor is templatized which is independent of the template argument you passed to std::function
.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…