Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
555 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

linux - Why do shells ignore SIGINT and SIGQUIT in backgrounded processes?

If I background a processes in a script or a -c snippet, the backgrounded processes ignores SIGINT and SIGQUIT:

Example:

$ alias ps='ps -o pid,ppid,pgrp,sid,stat,tty,ignored,blocked,caught,wchan,min_flt,pmem,args --forest'
$ sh -c 'sleep 1000 & sleep 1000 | sleep 1000' & 
  sleep 0.01; ps |grep -v -e ps -e grep 
  PID  PPID  PGRP   SID STAT TT                IGNORED          BLOCKED           CAUGHT WCHAN   MINFL %MEM COMMAND
 6197  2143  6197  6197 Ss   pts/28   0000000000380004 0000000000010000 000000004b817efb wait    10039  0.0 -bash
 7593  6197  7593  6197 S    pts/28   0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000010002 wait      148  0.0  \_ sh -c sleep 1000 & sleep 1000 | sleep 1000
 7595  7593  7593  6197 S    pts/28   0000000000000006 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 hrtime     85  0.0  |   \_ sleep 1000
 7596  7593  7593  6197 S    pts/28   0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 hrtime     85  0.0  |   \_ sleep 1000
 7597  7593  7593  6197 S    pts/28   0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 hrtime     85  0.0  |   \_ sleep 1000

This means that if I run kill -INT -$! (or fg followed by Ctrl-C) from the interactive parent shell (bash), the sleep processes backgrounded from the -c snippet isn't reached and survives.

  PID  PPID  PGRP   SID STAT TT                IGNORED          BLOCKED           CAUGHT WCHAN   MINFL %MEM COMMAND
 6197  2143  6197  6197 Ss   pts/28   0000000000380004 0000000000010000 000000004b817efb wait    10103  0.0 -bash
 7595     1  7593  6197 S    pts/28   0000000000000006 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 hrtime     85  0.0 sleep 1000

What is the reason for this behavior? Can it be disabled?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

When a shell runs a program in the background, the background process is not supposed to be tied to the original shell any more -- the shell can exit or be killed, and the background process should continue running.

If the shell is interactive and job control is being used, it puts the background process in a separate process group, so signals sent to the shell process group don't affect it.

But when job control is not being used, which is the default in non-interactive shells, the background process is in the same process group. To avoid the background process receiving keyboard signals that are just intended for the shell, it apparently ignores those signals in those child processes.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...