I've written a small utility class for C++11 which I use as a scope guard for easier handling of exception safety and similar things.
Seems somewhat like a hack. But I'm suprised I haven't seen it somewhere else using C++11 features. I think boost has something similar for C++98.
But is it a good idea? Or are there potential problems I have missed? Is there already a similar solution (with C++11 features) in boost or similar?
namespace detail
{
template<typename T>
class scope_exit : boost::noncopyable
{
public:
explicit scope_exit(T&& exitScope) : exitScope_(std::forward<T>(exitScope)){}
~scope_exit(){try{exitScope_();}catch(...){}}
private:
T exitScope_;
};
template <typename T>
scope_exit<T> create_scope_exit(T&& exitScope)
{
return scope_exit<T>(std::forward<T>(exitScope));
}
}
#define _UTILITY_EXIT_SCOPE_LINENAME_CAT(name, line) name##line
#define _UTILITY_EXIT_SCOPE_LINENAME(name, line) _UTILITY_EXIT_SCOPE_LINENAME_CAT(name, line)
#define UTILITY_SCOPE_EXIT(f) const auto& _UTILITY_EXIT_SCOPE_LINENAME(EXIT, __LINE__) = ::detail::create_scope_exit(f)
and it's used something like.
int main ()
{
ofstream myfile;
myfile.open ("example.txt");
UTILITY_SCOPE_EXIT([&]{myfile.close();}); // Make sure to close file even in case of exception
myfile << "Writing this to a file.
"; // Imagine this could throw
return 0;
}
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…