iphone - Handling redirects correctly with NSURLConnection

Question

For the purposes of this, I'm going to pretend the original url is http://host/form and the new url is https://host/form. (Note that before I ship this, both URLs are going to be secure. However, the nonsecure-to-secure seems like a convenient redirect to test this on.)

I'm accessing a web API using NSURLConnection that redirects me. Basically, I want to take everything I just submitted to http://hostaform and re-submit it to https://host/form. I thought this would be the default behavior, but it looks like the body is being lost in the redirect.

So I think I need to handle the connection:willSendRequest:redirectResponse: event of the NSURLConnection's delegate and re-attach the body. The problem is this message seems woefully underdocumented. The only info I can find on this method is NSURLConnection Class Reference, which isn't very helpful. Among other things, it includes this:

redirectResponse: The URL response that caused the redirect. May be nil in cases where this method is not being sent as a result of involving the delegate in redirect processing.

I'm not sure what this means. Combined with an initial willSendRequest: invocation, I think this is means willSendRequest: is being sent even for my initial request, prior to the redirect response. Is that correct?

So I've added code to my delegate to retain the body an extra time, and added this willSendRequest: handler:

- (NSURLRequest *)connection: (NSURLConnection *)inConnection
             willSendRequest: (NSURLRequest *)inRequest
            redirectResponse: (NSURLResponse *)inRedirectResponse;
{
    if (inRedirectResponse) {
        NSMutableURLRequest *r = [[inRequest mutableCopy] autorelease];
        [r setURL: [inRedirectResponse URL]];
        [r setHTTPBody: body];
        return r;
    } else {
        return inRequest;
    }
}

It doesn't work. But I'm not even sure if this is the right approach. It seems excessively hackish to me. What should I be doing? Is this documented anywhere? I've found nothing useful in Apple's documentation or using Google so far.

(This is on the iPhone, although there doesn't seem to be much difference in these classes.)

Answer 1

There's a note in section 10.3.2 of RFC 2616 about this behaviour:

Note: When automatically redirecting a POST request after receiving a 301 status code, some existing HTTP/1.0 user agents will erroneously change it into a GET request.

So this behaviour seems to be non-standard but historical. That GET request is not a POST, and it'll be missing the payload.

Interestingly enough, this is also in the same section:

If the 301 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.

That's pretty clear and seems to indicate we can't fix this, but I think ignoring this for the purpose of our own web service clients for services we pick (or control) is probably the least bad alternative.

So how do we solve this?

Instead of the willSendResponse: in the original question, I'm using this:

- (NSURLRequest *)connection: (NSURLConnection *)connection
             willSendRequest: (NSURLRequest *)request
            redirectResponse: (NSURLResponse *)redirectResponse;
{
    if (redirectResponse) {
        // we don't use the new request built for us, except for the URL
        NSURL *newURL = [request URL];
        // Previously, store the original request in _originalRequest.
        // We rely on that here!
        NSMutableURLRequest *newRequest = [_originalRequest mutableCopy];
        [newRequest setURL: newURL];
        return newRequest;
    } else {
        return request;
    }
}

The idea here is that instead of cloning the new request and trying to shape it the same as the one Cocoa Touch sends me, I create a clone of the original request and change just the URL to match the request Cocoa Touch sent me. That original request is still a POST with the payload attached.

If you control the server, it's worth reading RFC 2616, section 10.3 in its entirety to see if there's a better code you can use (while checking, of course, that iOS handles the better code as it should).

You could also make a mutable copy of the redirected request and replace its HTTP method with the HTTP method of the original request. Same general principle, though that would favour keeping things from the new request rather than the old. In some circumstances that might work better, but I haven't tested this yet.