The former example, T m 0, is an example of "operator notation". Scala has three types of operator notations, prefix (called unary), infix and postfix. Let's see examples of all three in action here:
class MyByte(val n : Int) {
require(n >= 0 && n <= 255)
def unary_! = new MyByte(n ^ 0xff)
def +(m : MyByte) = new MyByte(n + m.n)
def bits = (math.log(n) / math.log(2) + 1).toInt
override def toString = "0" * (8 - bits) + n.toBinaryString
}
An here it is in use:
scala> val a = new MyByte(5)
a: MyByte = 00000101
scala> val b = new MyByte(10)
b: MyByte = 00001010
scala> ! a // Prefix/Unary
res58: MyByte = 11111010
scala> a + b // Infix
res59: MyByte = 00001111
scala> b bits // Postfix
res60: Int = 4
While infix and postfix notations accept any valid Scala identifier, though there is talk of restricting postfix notation, only four identifiers can be used as prefix: ~, !, - and +.
Now, when you try "m 0", Scala discards it being a unary operator, on the grounds of not being a valid one (~, !, - and +). It finds that "m" is a valid object -- it is a function, not a method, and all functions are objects.
As "0" is not a valid Scala identifier, it cannot be neither an infix nor a postfix operator. Therefore, Scala complains that it expected ";" -- which would separate two (almost) valid expressions: "m" and "0". If you inserted it, then it would complain that m requires either an argument, or, failing that, a "_" to turn it into a partially applied function.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…