Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
100 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Is it possible to overload a function that can tell a fixed array from a pointer?

Motivation:

Almost for fun, I am trying to write a function overload that can tell apart whether the argument is a fixed-size array or a pointer.

double const  d[] = {1.,2.,3.};
double a;
double const* p = &a;
f(d); // call array version
f(p); // call pointer version

I find this particularly difficult because of the well known fact that arrays decay to pointer sooner than later. A naive approach would be to write

void f(double const* c){...}
template<size_t N> void f(double const(&a)[N]){...}

Unfortunately this doesn't work. Because in the best case the compiler determines the array call f(d) above to be ambiguous.

Partial solution:

I tried many things and the closest I could get was the following concrete code. Note also that, in this example code I use char instead of double, but it is very similar at the end.

First, I have to use SFINAE to disable conversions (from array ref to ptr) in the pointer version of the function. Second I had to overload for all possible arrays sizes (manually).

[compilable code]

#include<type_traits> // for enable_if (use boost enable_if in C++98)
#include<iostream>
template<class Char, typename = typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<Char, char>::value>::type>
void f(Char const* dptr){std::cout << "ptr" << std::endl;} // preferred it seems

void f(char const (&darr)[0] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[1] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[2] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[3] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[4] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[5] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
void f(char const (&darr)[6] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;} // this is the one called in this particular example
// ad infinitum ...

int main(){     
    f("hello"); // print ptr, ok because this is the fixed size array
    f(std::string("hello").c_str()); // print arr, ok because `c_str()` is a pointer
}

This works, but the problem is that I have to repeat the function for all possible values of N and using template<size_t N> gets me back to square zero, because with the template parameter the two calls get back to equal footing. In other works template<size_t N> void f(char const(&a)[N]){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;} doesn't help.

Is there any way to generalize the second overload without falling back to an ambiguous call? or is there some other approach?

A C++ or C++1XYZ answer is also welcome.

Two details: 1) I used clang for the experiments above, 2) the actual f will end up being an operator<<, I think know if that will matter for the solution.


Summary of solutions (based on other people's below) and adapted to a the concrete type char of the example. Both seem to depend on making the char const* pointer less obvious for the compiler:

1) One weird (portable?), (from the comment of @dyp.) Adding a reference qualifier to the pointer version:

template<class Char, typename = typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<Char, char>::value>::type>
void f(Char const* const& dptr){std::cout << "ptr" << std::endl;}

template<size_t N>
void f(char const (&darr)[N] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}

2) One elegant (special case from @user657267)

template<class CharConstPtr, typename = typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<CharConstPtr, char const*>::value>::type>
void f(CharConstPtr dptr){std::cout << "ptr" << std::endl;}

template<size_t N>
void f(char const (&darr)[N] ){std::cout << "const arr" << std::endl;}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This seems to work for me

#include <iostream>

template<typename T>
std::enable_if_t<std::is_pointer<T>::value>
foo(T) { std::cout << "pointer
"; }

template<typename T, std::size_t sz>
void foo(T(&)[sz]) { std::cout << "array
"; }

int main()
{
  char const* c;
  foo(c);
  foo("hello");
}

Bonus std::experimental::type_traits:

using std::experimental::is_pointer_v;
std::enable_if_t<is_pointer_v<T>>

Your comment made me try something even simpler

template<typename T> void foo(T) { std::cout << "pointer
"; }
template<typename T, unsigned sz> void foo(T(&)[sz]) { std::cout << "array
"; }

Of course the problem here is that foo is now callable for any type, depends on how lax you want your parameter checking to be.


One other way is to (ab)use rvalue references

void foo(char const*&) { std::cout << "pointer
"; }
void foo(char const*&&) { std::cout << "array
"; }

Obviously it's not foolproof.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...