C11: 6.7.9 Initialization (p11):
The initializer for a scalar shall be a single expression, optionally enclosed in braces.
Therefore, this is allowed
int q = {1};
You can enclose the initializer for scalar objects in braces ({}
). Note the verb shall is used here. The standard says:
5.1.1.3 Diagnostics (P1):
A conforming implementation shall produce at least one diagnostic message (identified in an implementation-defined manner) if a preprocessing translation unit or translation unit contains a violation of any syntax rule or constraint, even if the behavior is also explicitly specified as undefined or implementation-defined
So, it is up to the compiler how it handles
int q = {1,2};
Compiled on GCC 4.8.1 with flags -pedantic -Wall -Wextra
and it raised a warning
[Warning] excess elements in scalar initializer [enabled by default]
Now the question is: What happend with the remaining initializers?
It's a bug.
Note: C11: 6.5.17 (p3) says that the comma operator cannot appear in contexts where a comma is used to separate items in a list (such as arguments to functions or lists of initializers).
Do not confused the ,
in {1,2}
with comma operator. As Keith Thompson pointed out that, the expression in initializer to be an assignment-expression and it must not contain comma operator at top-level. That means it can be used within a parenthesized expression or within the second expression of a conditional operator in such contexts. In the function call
f(a, (t=3, t+2), c)
the function has three arguments, the second of which has the value 5
.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…