Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
332 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Too many initializers error for a simple array in bcc32

Compiling the following example

struct S {};

int main() {
  S array[1] = { S() };
}

with bcc32 I get the following error:

[bcc32 Error] test.cpp(4): E2225 Too many initializers

Is it a bug in bcc32 or am I missing something and the above example is not valid C++?

Both Clang and GCC compile this example without problems.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Borland BDS2006 (and possibly newer versions)

has some issues with default constructor/destructor for class and struct inside its C++ engine.

Adding custom (even empty) constructor/destructor solves many issues even yours. Try:

struct S
    {
    S(){};
    S(S& a){};
    ~S(){};
    S* operator = (const S *a){};
    //S* operator = (const S &a){}; // use this only if you have dynamic allocation members
    };

int main()
    {
    S array[1] = { S() };
    }

I tried this in BDS2006 and it looks like it works (hard to tell without anything inside struct) but you can compile and run at least...

I detect this behavior first in BDS2006 ... haven't really try BCB6 as it was junk from the start and dismiss it after few days (I think the worst BCB ever even beats BCB3,4) in BCB5 was all fine (before BDS2006 was this my favorite IDE) with this so they must have change the C++ engine (do not confuse with runtime libs !!!).

Adding even empty constructor destructor helps. If you got dynamic allocations you need to handle those of coarse. If you got nested class/struct do not forget to add these also to them too.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...