c++ - Does std::vector::insert() invalidate iterators if the vector has enough room (created through reserve)?

Question

Answering How to self-copy a vector? has got me a bit confused about iterator invalidation. Some literature says "if you use insert, push_back, etc. consider all iterators invalid". Thats clear, it might cause the vector to grow which invalidates iterators. What about the special case where I know there is going to be enough room?

first try:

myvec.reserve(myvec.size()*3);  //does this protect me from iterator invalidation?
vector<string>::iterator it = myvec.end();    
myvec.insert(myvec.end(), myvec.begin(), it);
myvec.insert(myvec.end(), myvec.begin(), it);

After some excellent answers second try:

auto size = myvec.size();
myvec.reserve(size*3);  //does this protect me from iterator invalidation?  
myvec.insert(myvec.end(), myvec.begin(), myvec.begin()+size);
myvec.insert(myvec.end(), myvec.begin(), myvec.begin()+size);

After more excellent answers third try:

auto size = myvec.size();
myvec.reserve(size*3);  //does this protect me from iterator invalidation?  
back_insert_iterator< vector<string> > back_it (myvec);
copy (myvec.begin(),myvec.begin()+size,back_it);
copy (myvec.begin(),myvec.begin()+size,back_it);

This quote from Josuttis' "C++ Standard Library Reference":

Inserting or removing elements invalidates references, pointers, and iterators that refer to the following element. If an insertion causes reallocation, it invalidates all references, iterators, and pointers.

suggests that my code is safe and defined behavior. Is there a passage in the standard which guaranties this?

Answer 1

The past-the-end iterator is always a bit special. I'd be careful. The standard says this (23.3.6.5):

If no reallocation happens, all the iterators and references before the insertion point remain valid.

The key here is "before the insertion point". Since your original it is not before the insertion point (since it is the insertion point), I wouldn't bank on it remaining valid.