Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
512 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

cocoa - const vs static NSStrings in Objective-C

These lines are both in the implementation file above the @implementation declaration.

NSString * const aVar = @"aVarStringValue";

static NSString *aVar = @"aVarStringValue";

As far as I understand, the second static is allocated once only within the lifetime of the application and this fact contributes to performance.

But does this mean it is essentially a memory leak seeing as that block of memory will never be released?

And does the first const declaration get allocated every time it is accessed in contrast?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

static keyword in Objective-C (and C/C++) indicates the visibility of the variable. A static variable (not in a method) may only be accessed within that particular .m file. A static local variable on the other hand, gets allocated only once.

const on the other hand, indicates that the reference may not be modified and/or reassigned; and is orthogonal on how it can be created (compilers may optimize consts though).

It's worth mentioning that NSString literals get initialized and never get destroyed in the life of application. They are allocated in a read-only part of the memory.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...