oauth 2.0 - Dealing with expired access tokens in OAuth2 implicit grant

Question

The specification of OAuth2 states that an authorization server must not issue a refresh token when using implicit grant. In our use case we protect a RESTful API with OAuth2 and use a Single Page Javascript application as a client for this API. As it would be very difficult to redirect to the authorization server after an access token has expired, we are searching for a better way to get a new valid token. I could think about two different approaches and wonder which one could be better:

1. Use a hidden iframe to Rerequest a valid access token. For this it is necessary to include a parameter like “prompt=none” which tells the OAuth provider neither to challenge authentication, nor to display an authorization page. If the user is authenticated and has authorized the application the server will send back an access token in the urls # parameters. If one of the previous conditions is not fulfilled, it will redirect with an error like #error=authentication%20lost. With this behaviour we can use short lived access tokens also with an implicit flow.

2. We could use an additional scope (e.g. offline) which tells the server to hand out a refresh token. Even if the original spec says that implicit flow does not issue refresh tokens (which is correct if the client only uses OAuth it for a first authorization) you are free to define your own scopes for your particular application. You should consider to only allow this scope from well-known clients.

Both approaches are very similar to those of OpenID Connect. Unfortunately there are not many implementations of OpenID Connect at the moment. So first step would be to extend the OAuth2 server until OIC will be more popular.

So which approach should be preferred?

EDIT: The token endpoint needs client authentication, which is only possible for confidential clients like server-side applications. With the second approach it would only be possible to let the RESTful API in our case the resource provider to refresh the token and send it back to the client. I think this would be a security risk. So probably we have only one valid approach.

Answer 1

I'm trying to achieve the exact same thing at the moment.

I've actually implemented hidden iframe approach and then realized you have to be very careful with iframes. Any malicious website can contain your iframe and get access token easily if you don't specify X-Frame-Options.

Best approach for refreshing token should be password grant as specified by the spec. (I wanted my users to login with their facebook account & implicit flow was easier to develop this. I have not quite figured out how to do this with password grant.)

2nd approach also came accross my mind and seems much safer than the 1st to me, since you can usually trust the https & browser storage to keep your tokens secret.

Edit

I realized, even with X-Frame-Options most browsers can't prevent redirects, because this header is attached to the response body and redirected URL will be exposed, therefore access tokens exposed.

Update Looks like hash fragment is protected by the browser when accessed from the parent page within different domain. So I assume #access_token is safe. My bad. Just as a reminder callback page has to store the access token in its own right, instead of (my original intention) delegating it to the parent page like window.parent.storeAccessToken(hash); which obviously is a dumb thing to do.