From [5.3.3/1], I found that:
The?sizeof?operator shall not be applied to an expression that has function or incomplete type
From [3.9/5] I found that:
Incompletely-defined object types and?cv void?are?incomplete types
Anyway, for sizeof
does not evaluate it's operands, I would have said that sizeof(void())
was a legal expression (actually GCC compiles it and the result is 1).
On the other side, from here, void
is not mentioned while discussing sizeof
, neither when the types having size 1 are mentioned, nor in the list of the ones having an implementation defined size.
The question is thus: is sizeof(void())
a legal expression?
Is it guaranteed to have size equal to 1?
Or is it a legal expression resulting in an UB and that's all?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…