Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
162 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - How do I link different versions of the same library in g++?

I'm trying to figure out how to load two different versions of libstdc++.so on a SLES10 machine. My client has a process Foo, which is built with GCC 4.1.2, and thus uses the 6.0.8 version of libstdc++.so. We are also building shared library called libBar.so. This library will be dynamically loaded by Foo at runtime. libBar.so is compiled using GCC 4.3.6, and libstdc++ version 6.0.10.

Currently, when I try to have Foo load libBar.so, I get the following error.

error: unable to load shared object '/usr/lib64/libBar.so': /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/lib64/libBar.so)

At the moment, the only way that I can get this to work is to change my library load order (via ld.so.conf) so that Foo and libbar.so both load the same (6.0.10) libstdc++.so. However, this isn't a vialbe solution, since it requires that I modify the client's system.

What I'd like to do is have Foo load it's verions of libstdc++.so and libBar.so link to it's own version of libstdc++.so, but I can't figure out how to write my Makefile to make that happen. Here's what I have so far, for my LIBADD line in Makefile.am...

libBar_la_LIBADD = ../../vendor/SLES10/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.10

Which I would assume would like to that SPECIFIC version of libstdc++.so. However, when I run ldd against the fully compiled and linked libBar.so, this is the line I see...

libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002aaaaeac5000)

Why isn't it linking specifically to libstdc++.so.6.0.10? What should I be doing instead?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I had a similar issue with a 3rd-party library that used an obsolete version of libstdc++.

I solved it by pre-linking the 3rd-party library statically with that old version of libstdc++. The end result was another shared library that did not have unresolved libstdc++ symbols. The command line was something like this:

ld --relocatable -o lib3rd-party-prelinked.so lib3rd-party.so /usr/lib64/libstdc++.a.6

And then I used lib3rd-party-prelinked.so instead of lib3rd-party.so. (Lookup --relocatable in man ld).

It was possible in my case because the 3rd-party library exposed a C API, no C++ standard library components were used in its interface.

If your 3rd-party library exposes C++ standard library classes in its interface whose ABIs are different between these libstdc++ versions, that is not going to work. E.g. your application passes a std::list<> with the new ABI to the 3rd-party library that expects a std::list<> with the old ABI version. Even if it links, that will cause undefined behaviour at run-time.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...