Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
596 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - replacement for std::binary_function

std::binary_function is deprecated now and is going to be deleted in . I searched on different publications, but I couldn't find a exact way to replace it. I'd like to know how should I write the following code in style.

template <class T>
inline T absolute(const T &x) {
    return (x >= 0) ? x : -x;
}

template <class T>
struct absoluteLess : public std::binary_function<T, T, bool> {
    bool operator()(const T &x, const T &y) const {
        return absolute(x) < absolute(y);
    }
};

template <class T>
struct absoluteGreater : public std::binary_function<T, T, bool> {
    bool operator()(T &x, T &y) const {
        return absolute(x) > absolute(y);
    }
};

EDIT

I'm using the functions in the following way:

output[j] = *std::max_element(input.begin() + prev,
                              input.begin() + pos,
                              absoluteLess<float>());

input and output are std::vectors, inside a for-loop.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

First, my advice is to watch CppCon 2015: Stephan T. Lavavej "functional: What's New, And Proper Usage". std::binary_function is mentioned on slide 36, at around 36 mins in the video. You can find the slides at github.com/CppCon/CppCon2015). It doesn't go into detail why you shouldn't use std::binary_function, but if you're using something that's been deprecated since C++11, then you would probably benefit from watching it.

If you want the actual rationale for not using it, try n4190:

unary_function/binary_function were useful helpers when C++98-era adaptors needed argument_type/etc. typedefs. Such typedefs are unnecessary given C++11's perfect forwarding, decltype, and so forth. (And they're inapplicable to overloaded/templated function call operators.) Even if a class wants to provide these typedefs for backwards compatibility, it can do so directly (at a minor cost in verbosity) instead of inheriting from unary_function/binary_function, which is what the Standard itself started doing when these helpers were deprecated.

Now you simply don't need it, so you can remove all traces of it from your program.

In C++14, transparent comparators were added. But it can be implemented in C++11. Just specialize it for void:

template<>
struct absoluteLess<void> {
    template< class T, class U>
    constexpr auto operator()( T&& lhs, U&& rhs ) const
      -> decltype(absolute(std::forward<T>(lhs)) < absolute(std::forward<U>(rhs)))
    {
        return absolute(std::forward<T>(lhs)) < absolute(std::forward<U>(rhs));
    }
}
};

Now the type can be deduced:

std::max_element(v.begin(), v.end(), absoluteLess<>());

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

56.9k users

...