I'm seeing some odd behaviour when returning a string literal from a function that should perform an implicit conversion with g++ (version 4.7.3). Can anyone explain why the following code:
#include <stdio.h>
class Test
{
public:
template <unsigned int N>
Test(const char (&foo)[N])
{
printf("Template const char array constructor
");
}
Test(char* foo)
{
printf("char* constructor
");
}
};
Test fn()
{
return "foo";
}
int main()
{
Test t("bar");
Test u = fn();
return 0;
}
produces the result:
Template const char array constructor
char* constructor
on g++? The surprising thing being that the char* constructor is chosen in preference to the const char array constructor when generating the return value from fn(). Admittedly there is a warning, "deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*'"
Even more surprisingly if you remove the char* constructor then the code doesn't compile with g++.
It works as expected with clang (Template constructor used both times), which makes me think this is a compiler bug, but maybe it's just a weird corner of the C++ spec - could anyone confirm?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…