Consider:
#include <map>
int main()
{
std::map< int, int > m;
m[ 0 ] = 0;
m[ 1 ] = 1;
m.erase( 0 ); // ok
m.erase( 2 ); // no-op
m.erase( m.find( 2 ) ); // boom!
}
(OK, so the title talks abouting erasing an end() iterator, but find will return end() for a non-existent key.)
Why is erasing a non-existent key OK, yet erasing end() blows up. I couldn't see any explicit mention of this in the standard?
I've tried this on VS2005 (throws an exception in debug configuration) and GCC 4.0.1 (100% CPU). Is it implementation dependent?
Thanks.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…