How about this (updated):
XPath 1.0:
"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo'
and substring-after(@id, '_') >= 0
and substring-after(@id, '_') <= 99999999]"
Edit #2: The OP made a change to the question. The following, even more reduced XPath 1.0 expression works for me:
"//div[substring(@id, 1, 13) = 'post_message_'
and substring(@id, 14) >= 0
and substring(@id, 14) <= 99999999]"
XPath 2.0 has a convenient matches()
function:
"//div[matches(@id, '^foo_d{1,8}$')]"
Apart from the better portability, I would expect the numerical expression (XPath 1.0 style) to perform better than the regex test, though this would only become noticeable when processing large data sets.
Original version of the answer:
"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo'
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) = substring-after(@id, '_')
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) >= 0
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) <= 99999999]"
The use of the number()
function is unnecessary, because the mathematical comparison operators coerce their arguments to numbers implicitly, any non-numbers will become NaN
and the greater than/less than tests will fail.
I also removed the encoding of the angle brackets, since this is an XML requirement, not an XPath requirement.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…