Here's an obvious situation that must arise all the time for people:
struct Foundation {
var columns : [Column] = [Column(), Column()]
}
struct Column : CustomStringConvertible {
var cards = [Card]()
var description : String {
return String(describing:self.cards)
}
}
struct Card {}
var f = Foundation()
for var c in f.columns {
c.cards.append(Card())
}
That code is legal but of course it has no effect on f
, because var c
is still a copy — the actual columns
of f
are unaffected.
I am not having any difficulties understanding why that happens. My question is what people generally do about it.
Clearly I can just make the whole matter go away by declaring Column a class instead of a struct, but is that what people usually do? (I'm trying to follow a mental stricture that one should avoid classes when there's no need for dynamic dispatch / polymorphism / subclassing; maybe I'm carrying that too far, or maybe there's something else people usually do, like using inout
somehow.)
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…