Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
483 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

jsp - Handling of server-side HTTP 4nn/5nn errors returning a whole HTML document in jQuery's ajax requests

To the point: how would you handle a server-side HTTP 4nn/5nn errors in jQuery's ajax requests? This case concerns a JSP/Servlet webapplication at the server side. Here I am not talking about trivial runtime exceptions such as NullPointerException and so on. Assume that they're all handled perfectly. A good example of such a HTTP 4nn/5nn error is 401 unauthorized (insufficient user rights) and 500 internal server error (database down, I/O error, Errors, etc). Assume that they cannot (or should not) be caught at coding level.

Right now I have just declared an <error-page> in web.xml for those kind of errors. It basically forwards the request to a predefinied JSP/HTML error page wherein the enduser is informed that a serious error has occurred and that the user can contact [email protected] for further assistance. The same page also displays the global details about the error/exception.

It works perfectly in regular HTTP requests, but how would you handle it in XMLHtttp requests using jQuery? What's the best for the user experience? To me, it would be just displaying the entire error page as if it is a normal HTTP request. I've solved it as follows:

function init() {
    $.ajaxSetup({
        error: handleXhrError
    });
}

function handleXhrError(xhr) {
    document.open();
    document.write(xhr.responseText);
    document.close();
}

Although it works perfectly, it feels to me like a hack. Replacing the entire document with the contents of the HTTP error page. But is that also the way you would follow? If not, can you maybe elaborate why not and what way you'd prefer? The only alternative I see is using JS to display some alert/message box to inform the user about the unresolveable error, but the user could dismiss it and continue with the page while that should not be possible.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

After all, dealing with errors on asynchronous requests the same way as with synchronous requests is the best for user experience. Only, the

function handleXhrError(xhr) {
    document.open();
    document.write(xhr.responseText);
    document.close();
}

will fail in IE6/7/8 when you've <script> elements which needs to be loaded and initialized as well. IE6/7/8 namely won't do that. In order to get IE to do that, you basically need to keep the current <head> element and only replace its children by $("head").html(newHead). The same should be done for the <body> element.

function handleXhrError(xhr) {
    var newDocument = xhr.responseText;
    $("head").html(newDocument.substring(newDocument.indexOf("<head>") + 6, newDocument.indexOf("</head>")));
    $("body").html(newDocument.substring(newDocument.indexOf("<body>") + 6, newDocument.indexOf("</body>")));
}

Nasty, but it's not possible to do a $(xhr.responseText) when the response text represents a whole HTML document with a head and body. Don't forget to alter the substring index accordingly when you've some attributes on <body> of the error page template (e.g. ID, class, etc).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...