This json structure is inherently gson-unfriendly. i.e You cannot model this cleanly in java because the "object" key refers to a dynamic type. The best you can do with this structure is model it like so:
public class Models extends ArrayList<Models.Container> {
public class Container {
public int type;
public Object object;
}
public class Type1Object {
public String title1;
public String title2;
}
public class Type3Object {
public String url;
public String text;
public int width;
public int height;
}
public class Type4Object {
public int id;
public int type;
public int city;
}
}
Then do some awkward switch on type and the object field:
String json = "{ ... json string ... }";
Gson gson = new Gson();
Models model = gson.fromJson(json, Models.class);
for (Models.Container container : model) {
String innerJson = gson.toJson(container.object);
switch(container.type){
case 1:
Models.Type1Object type1Object = gson.fromJson(innerJson, Models.Type1Object.class);
// do something with type 1 object...
break;
case 2:
String[] type2Object = gson.fromJson(innerJson, String[].class);
// do something with type 2 object...
break;
case 3:
Models.Type3Object[] type3Object = gson.fromJson(innerJson, Models.Type3Object[].class);
// do something with type 3 object...
break;
case 4:
Models.Type4Object type4Object = gson.fromJson(innerJson, Models.Type4Object.class);
// do something with type 4 object...
break;
}
}
Ultimately the best solution is to get the json structure changed to something more compatible with java.
E.g:
[
{
"type": 1,
"type1Object": {
"title1": "title1",
"title2": "title2"
}
},
{
"type": 2,
"type2Object": [
"string",
"string",
"string"
]
},
{
"type": 3,
"type3Object": [
{
"url": "url",
"text": "text",
"width": 600,
"height": 600
},
{
"url": "url",
"text": "text",
"width": 600,
"height": 600
}
]
},
{
"type": 4,
"type4Object": {
"id": 337203,
"type": 1,
"city": "1"
}
}
]
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…