I don't think you're doing anything wrong, looks like BV2Int
is buggy:
x = BitVec('x', 3)
prove(x <= 3)
prove(BV2Int(x) <= 3)
Z3py proves the first one, but gives the counter-example x=0
for the second. That doesn't sound right. (The only explanation might be some weird Python thing, but I don't see how.)
Also note that the model you get will depend on whether +
treats the bit-vector as a signed number in the Python bindings, which I believe is the case. However, BV2Int
might not do so, treating it as an unsigned value. This would further complicate the matters.
In any case, looks like BV2Int
is not quite kosher; I'd stay away from it until there's an official answer from the Z3 folks.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…