Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
421 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Missing const_iterator overload of std::vector::erase() with g++ 4.8

The following example will not compile using g++ 4.8.2:

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;

int main() {
    vector<int> v {1, 2, 3};

    v.erase(v.cbegin()); // Compiler complains

    return 0;
}

The compiler says the following. (It isn't very readable, but it's complaining that there's not a known conversion between vector<int>::const_iterator and vector<int>::iterator.)

prog.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
prog.cpp:8:20: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::vector<int>::erase(std::vector<int>::const_iterator)’
  v.erase(v.cbegin());
                    ^
prog.cpp:8:20: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/vector:69:0,
                 from prog.cpp:2:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/vector.tcc:134:5: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::erase(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >; typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer = int*]
     vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
     ^
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/vector.tcc:134:5: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::vector<int>::const_iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<const int*, std::vector<int> >}’ to ‘std::vector<int>::iterator {aka __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >}’
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/vector.tcc:146:5: note: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::erase(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator, std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator) [with _Tp = int; _Alloc = std::allocator<int>; std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::iterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<int*, std::vector<int> >; typename std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer = int*]
     vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
     ^
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/vector.tcc:146:5: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided

Why? The C++11 standard plainly states, in §23.3.6.5, that the vector::erase function takes a const_iterator. (Paraphrases are here and here.)

What's a good workaround, assuming that I must use a const_iterator?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is a known bug in gcc: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158

erase requires an iterator instead of a const_iterator with current gcc's.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...