Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
403 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - function implementation with enable_if outside of class definition

So basically, I have a very basic generic class for now, currently testing the type_traits header. I am currently trying to make a function to work with certain types i.e arithmetic ones for now.

#include <type_traits>

template <typename T> class Test {
    public:
        template <typename U = T> 
        typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<U>::value>::type print();
}; 

The function works perfectly and for arithmetic types only.

But I like to keep my classes tidy and only have them have prototypes, while the function implementations are outside of the class.

With standard templates i.e

void test();

template <typename T> void Test<T>::test() {}

It is simple and I know how to, but I have no clue how to declare the implementation outside of the class with "std::enable_if" and every attempt I have made, during compilation says that that the prototype does not match any in the class.

I have managed to find a similar question here but the class there is standard and not generic.

PS. I am using MinGW-w64 with -std=c++17

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You need one set of template parameters for the class template and one separate set of template parameters for the member function template. You need to repeat the entire complicated return type, since it's part of the function template signature. And note you cannot repeat the default argument =T, or the compiler will think you're trying to define it twice (without checking whether or not the new definition is identical).

template <typename T> template <typename U>
typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<U>::value>::type
Test<T>::print()
{
    // Implementation here.
}

By the way, you're using the "long way" of writing the type, as was needed in C++11. But C++14 introduced a std::enable_if_t shortcut, and C++17 introduced a std::is_arithmetic_v shortcut. So if you're using C++17, you can also write the type

typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<U>::value>::type

as just

std::enable_if_t<std::is_arithmetic_v<U>>

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

2.1m questions

2.1m answers

60 comments

57.0k users

...