CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE ty_1 AS OBJECT ( fn VARCHAR2(100),
sl NUMBER,
hd DATE );
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE ty_1_table AS TABLE OF ty_1;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION FN_RET_COL
RETURN ty_1_table
AS
c ty_1_table := TY_1_TABLE();
BEGIN
c.extend;
C(1) := TY_1('A', 1, '10-JUN-2013');
c.extend;
C(2) := TY_1('B', 2, '11-JUN-2013');
c.extend;
C(3) := TY_1('C', 3, '12-JUN-2013');
RETURN c;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION FN_RET_PIPE RETURN ty_1_table PIPELINED IS
BEGIN
PIPE ROW (TY_1('A', 1, '10-JUN-2013'));
PIPE ROW (TY_1('B', 2, '11-JUN-2013'));
PIPE ROW (TY_1('C', 3, '12-JUN-2013'));
END;
SELECT * FROM TABLE (fn_ret_col);
SELECT * FROM TABLE (fn_ret_pipe);
First one FN_RET_COL
is Regular table function and second one FN_RET_PIPE
is Pipelined Function.
I studied in a book like
Regular table functions require collections to be fully populated before they are returned where as PIPELINED FUNCTION
use the PIPE ROW
call to push rows out of the function as soon as they are created, rather than building up a table collection. saving memory and allowing subsequent processing to start before all the rows are generated.
My doubt is : How PIPELINED Function
saves memory?
If I am not wrong, It is piping all the rows and storing them in a memory area and then printing all the rows in the console. Or is it like, it is directly printing row by row as soon as a new record is piped in the console without storing it anywhere?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION FN_RET_COL RETURN TY_1_TABLE
PIPELINED IS
BEGIN
PIPE ROW(TY_1('A',1,'10-JUN-2013'));
DBMS_LOCK.sleep(seconds => 10);
PIPE ROW(TY_1('B',2,'11-JUN-2013'));
DBMS_LOCK.sleep(seconds => 10);
PIPE ROW(TY_1('C',3,'12-JUN-2013'));
END;
If my second case is right, then how does the above code works?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…