The natural way to recur over a list is not the best way to solve this problem. Using append
, as suggested in the accepted answer pointed by @lancery, is not a good idea either - and anyway if you're learning your way in Scheme it's best if you try to implement the solution yourself, I'll show you what to do, but first a tip - don't use list
as a parameter name, that's a built-in procedure and you'd be overwriting it. Use other name, say, lst
.
It's simpler to reverse a list by means of a helper procedure that accumulates the result of consing each element at the head of the result, this will have the effect of reversing the list - incidentally, the helper procedure is tail-recursive. Here's the general idea, fill-in the blanks:
(define (reverse lst)
(<???> lst '())) ; call the helper procedure
(define (reverse-aux lst acc)
(if <???> ; if the list is empty
<???> ; return the accumulator
(reverse-aux <???> ; advance the recursion over the list
(cons <???> <???>)))) ; cons current element with accumulator
Of course, in real-life you wouldn't implement reverse
from scratch, there's a built-in procedure for that.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…