aggregate functions - Precedence of a mysql session variable value in an sql statement

Question

What is the standard behaviour of a session variable when used in an SQL statement.

Case 1:
In the following example, session variable is behaving as expected.

mysql> set @m1=0, @m2=0, @m3=0;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql>
mysql> select
    ->  @m1 := 55 m1, @m2 := 42 m2, @m3 := 66 m3,
    ->  @m1, @m2, @m3,
    ->  @b1 := greatest( @m1, @m2, @m3 ) b1,
    ->  @b2 := ( ( @total := @m1 + @m2 + @m3 )
    ->           - ( @b1 + least( @m1, @m2, @m3 ) )) b2,
    ->  @total total;
+----+----+----+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
| m1 | m2 | m3 | @m1  | @m2  | @m3  | b1   | b2   | total |
+----+----+----+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
| 55 | 42 | 66 |   55 |   42 |   66 |   66 |   55 |   163 |
+----+----+----+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql>
mysql> set @m1=0, @m2=0, @m3=0;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select
    ->  @m1 := m1+3, @m2 := m2+3, @m3 := m3+3,
    ->  @m1, @m2, @m3,
    ->  @b1 := greatest( @m1, @m2, @m3 ) b1,
    ->  @b2 := ( ( @total := @m1 + @m2 + @m3 )
    ->           - ( @b1 + least( @m1, @m2, @m3 ) )) b2,
    ->  @total total
    -> from
    ->  ( select 55 m1, 42 m2, 66 m3  union all select 48, 63, 92 ) marks_list
    -> ;
+-------------+-------------+-------------+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
| @m1 := m1+3 | @m2 := m2+3 | @m3 := m3+3 | @m1  | @m2  | @m3  | b1   | b2   | total |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
|          58 |          45 |          69 |   58 |   45 |   69 |   69 |   58 |   172 |
|          51 |          66 |          95 |   51 |   66 |   95 |   95 |   66 |   212 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+------+------+------+------+------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

The above example did not use any of aggregate functions.

Case 2:
When a similar statement was executed with aggregate functions like count, sum, group by, the results pattern was entirely different.

Please find an example on: SQL Fiddle

Before posting this query, I tried to understand the SQL-Query-Order-of-Operations.

Answer 1

If I understand correctly, you are asking about the order of evaluation of expressions in select statements. MySQL documentation is quite clear that you cannot depend on this:

In the following statement, you might think that MySQL will evaluate @a first and then do an assignment second:

SELECT @a, @a:=@a+1, ...;

However, the order of evaluation for expressions involving user variables is undefined.

I think the issue is your expectation that the values are assigned in order. This is incorrect. That said, I must admit that I do make the same sequential evaluation assumption from time-to-time when using variables, primarily out of laziness and the fact that it does generally work.

If you want to guarantee sequential evaluation, then use the case trick:

select (case when (@m := 55) is null then null
             when (@m := 42) is null then null
        . . .
        end)

The case guarantees sequential evaluation of the conditions until one is true. The comparison to null ensures that all get evaluated.