Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
604 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

multithreading - How to search through next available thread to do computation

I am doing multithreading in C++. This may be something very standard but I can't seem to find it anywhere or know any key terms to search for it online.

I want to do some sort of computation many times but with multiple threads. For each iteration of computation, I want to find the next available thread that has finished its previous computation to do the next iteration. I don't want to cycle through the threads in order since the next thread to be called may not have finished its work yet.

E.g. Suppose I have a vector of int and I want to sum up the total with 5 threads. I have the to-be-updated total sum stored somewhere and the count for which element I am currently up to. Each thread looks at the count to see the next position and then takes that vector value and adds it to the total sum so far. Then it goes back to look for the count to do the next iteration. So for each iteration, the count increments then looks for the next available thread (maybe one already waiting for count; or maybe they are all busy still working) to do the next iteration. We do not increase the number of threads but I want to be able to somehow search through all the 5 threads for the first one that finish to do the next computation.

How would I go about coding this. Every way I know of involves doing a loop through the threads such that I can't check for the next available one which may be out of order.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Use semafor (or mutex, always mix up those two) on a global variable telling you what is next. The semafor will lock the other threads out as long as you access the variable making that threads access clear.

So, assuming you have an Array of X elements. And a global called nextfree witch is initalized to 0, then a psudo code would look like this:

while (1)
{
    <lock semafor INT>
    if (nextfree>=X)
    {
        <release semnafor INT>
        <exit and terminate thread>
    }
    <Get the data based on "nextfree">
    nextfree++;
    <release semafor INT>

    <do your stuff withe the chunk you got>
}

The point here is that each thread will be alone and have exlusive access to the data struct within the semafor lock and therefore can access the next available regardless of what the others doing. (The other threads will have to wait in line if they are done while another thread working on getting next data chunk. When you release only ONE that stands in queue will get access. The rest will have to wait.)

There are some things to be ware of. Semafor's might lock your system if you manage to exit in the wrong position (Withour releasing it) or create a deadlock.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to OStack Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...