I have the following code:
n = 10000;
s = 100;
Z = rand(n, 2);
x = rand(s, 1);
y = rand(s, 1);
fun = @(a) exp(a);
In principle, the anonymous function f
can have a different form. I need to create two arrays.
First, I need to create an array of size n x s x s
with generic elements
fun(Z(i, 1) - x(j)) * fun(Z(i, 2) - y(k))
where i=1,...n
while j,k=1,...,s
. What I can easily do, is to construct matrices using bsxfun
, e.g.
bsxfun(@(x, y) fun(x - y), Z(:, 1), x');
bsxfun(@(x, y) fun(x - y), Z(:, 2), y');
But then I would need to combine them into 3D
array by multiplying element-wise each column of those two matrices.
In the second step, I need to create an array of size n x 3 x s x s
, which would look from one side as the following matrix
[ones(n, 1), Z(:, 1) - x(i), Z(:, 2) - y(j);]
where i=1,...s
, j=1,...s
. I could loop over the two extra dimensions with something like
A = [ones(n, 1), Z(:, 1) - x(1), Z(:, 2) - y(1)];
for i = 1:s
for j = 1:s
A(:, :, i, j) = [ones(n, 1), Z(:, 1) - x(i), Z(:, 2) - y(j);];
end
end
Is there a way to avoid loops?
In the third step, suppose that after obtaining array out1
(output from first step), I want to create a new array out3
of dimension n x n x s x s
, which contains the original array out1
on the main diagonal, i.e. out3(i,i,s,s) = out1(i, s, s)
and out3(i,j,s,s)=0
for all i~=j
. Is there some kind of alternative of diag
for creating "diagonal arrays"? Alternatively, if I create n x n x s x s
array of zeros, is there a way to put out1
on the main diagonal?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os