Yes, because that's not how you remove a range from outside code. Instead, do this:
list.subList(start, end).clear();
This actually calls removeRange
behind the scenes.?
The OP asks why removeRange
is not part of the List
public API. The reason is described in Item 40 of Effective Java 2nd ed, and I quote it here:
There are three techniques for shortening overly long parameter lists. One is to break the method up into multiple methods, each of which requires only a subset of the parameters. If done carelessly, this can lead to too many methods, but it can also help reduce the method count by increasing orthogonality. For example, consider the java.util.List
interface. It does not provide methods to find the first or last index of an element in a sublist, both of which would require three parameters. Instead it provides the subList
method, which takes two parameters and returns a view of a sublist. This method can be combined with the indexOf
or lastIndexOf
methods, each of which has a single parameter, to yield the desired functionality. Moreover, the subList
method can be combined with any method that operates on a List
instance to perform arbitrary computations on sublists. The resulting API has a very high power-to-weight ratio.
One can argue that removeRange
doesn't have that many parameters and is therefore probably not a candidate for this treatment, but given that there's a way to invoke removeRange
through the subList
, there is no reason to clutter up the List
interface with a redundant method.
? The AbstractList.removeRange
documentation says:
This method is called by the clear
operation on this list and its subLists. Overriding this method to take advantage of the internals of the list implementation can substantially improve the performance of the clear
operation on this list and its subLists.
Also, see OpenJDK's implementation of AbstractList.clear
and SubList.removeRange
.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…