As @geekosaur explained, the shell does the redirection before running the command. When you type this:
sudo foo >/some/file
Your current shell process makes a copy of itself that first tries to open /some/file for writing, then if that succeeds it makes that file descriptor its standard output, and only if that succeeds does it execute sudo. This is failing at the first step.
If you're allowed (sudoer configs often preclude running shells), you can do something like this:
sudo bash -c 'foo >/some/file'
But I find a good solution in general is to use | sudo tee instead of > and | sudo tee -a instead of >>. That's especially useful if the redirection is the only reason I need sudo in the first place; after all, needlessly running processes as root is precisely what sudo was created to avoid. And running echo as root is just silly.
echo '[archlinuxfr]' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
echo ' ' | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
I added > /dev/null on the end because tee sends its output to both the named file and its own standard output, and I don't need to see it on my terminal. (The tee command acts like a "T" connector in a physical pipeline, which is where it gets its name.) And I switched to single quotes ('...') instead of doubles ("...") so that everything is literal and I didn't have to put a backslash in front of the $ in $arch. (Without the quotes or backslash, $arch would get replaced by the value of the shell parameter arch, which probably doesn't exist, in which case the $arch is replaced by nothing and just vanishes.)
So that takes care of writing to files as root using sudo. Now for a lengthy digression on ways to output newline-containing text in a shell script. :)
To BLUF it, as they say, my preferred solution would be to just feed a here-document into the above sudo tee command; then there is no need for cat or echo or printf or any other commands at all. The single quotation marks have moved to the sentinel introduction <<'EOF', but they have the same effect there: the body is treated as literal text, so $arch is left alone:
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null <<'EOF'
[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
EOF
But while that's how I'd do it, there are alternatives. Here are a few:
You can stick with one echo per line, but group all of them together in a subshell, so you only have to append to the file once:
(echo '[archlinuxfr]'
echo 'Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch'
echo ' ') | sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
If you add -e to the echo (and you're using a shell that supports that non-POSIX extension), you can embed newlines directly into the string using
:
# NON-POSIX - NOT RECOMMENDED
echo -e '[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But as it says above, that's not POSIX-specified behavior; your shell might just echo a literal -e followed by a string with a bunch of literal
s instead. The POSIX way of doing that is to use printf instead of echo; it automatically treats its argument like echo -e does, but doesn't automatically append a newline at the end, so you have to stick an extra
there, too:
printf '[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
With either of those solutions, what the command gets as an argument string contains the two-character sequence
, and it's up to the command program itself (the code inside printf or echo) to translate that into a newline. In many modern shells, you have the option of using ANSI quotes $'...', which will translate sequences like
into literal newlines before the command program ever sees the string. That means such strings work with any command whatsoever, including plain old -e-less echo:
echo $'[archlinuxfr]
Server = http://repo.archlinux.fr/$arch
' |
sudo tee -a /etc/pacman.conf >/dev/null
But, while more portable than echo -e, ANSI quotes are still a non-POSIX extension.
And again, while those are all options, I prefer the straight tee <<EOF solution above.
